To make your speech clear and understandable, use words with which the audience will be familiar.
One of the main objectives of a speech is to make your point of view clear to the audience who is listening to your speech. For this purpose, it is essential that familiar, simple words be chosen in your speech so that the audience can better relate to your speech.
Oftentimes, a speaker chooses complex words from the dictionary thinking that by using big words he might be able to impress the listeners. However, this strategy is not a good one because the audience needs to understand what point you are making through your speech.
Hence, familiar words shall always be used in a speech.
Although a part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this question:
To make your speech clear and understandable, use words with which the audience will be:
- distracted
-familiar
-unknown
-unwanted
To learn more about speech, click here:
brainly.com/question/25783020
#SPJ4
The correct option is this: LEON'S AND FATHER PAUL'S DIFFERING PERSPECTIVE OF THE SITUATION REFLECT THEIR LARGER CULTURAL CONFLICTS.
From the passage given above, it can be seen that Leon and the priest have different opinion about the way the burial should be conducted. Leon believed that having the holy water is enough while the priest think otherwise. The different perspectives of these two individuals about the issue at hand stems from their different cultural beliefs.
Answer:
C) Of course; Then again
Explanation:
The sentence deals with contrasting yet common pinion of the speaker. So, to make the sentence in a plausibly correct sentence, the word pairings of "Of course and Then again" should be used. Then the sentence becomes
I am of two minds on this issue.<em><u>Of course</u></em>, I feel strongly that freedom should not ever be restricted.<u><em>Then again</em></u>, there are times when we may have to temporarily forfeit our rights for the sake of our safety.
The first choice agrees with the claim. But the use of "then again" gives the other side of the opinion while not exactly refuting the preceding claim. The there given word pairing option are not usable for their standing with the passage can't really support the claims made in it.
E It says how it could be burden on the US justice system.
