The gluten-free diet was originally intended for people with celiac disease, but it’s now become a new fad diet for the general
population. Many people state that gluten-free diets are beneficial for people who aren’t sensitive to gluten, while others suggest that there’s no benefit. Use credible resources to evaluate the argument yourself. Do you think there’s sufficient scientific evidence to support the use of a gluten-free diet in people who aren’t sensitive to gluten? Provide evidence that supports your argument.
The gluten free diet is helpful for the people that are sensitive to food with gluten it which occurs due to the celiac disease. It was originally meant for the such people but it becomes a new fad. However, there is no compelling evidence to support that gluten free diet helps in health improvements n non sensitive people.
In other hand there are majority of doctors are against the use of gluten free diet is not good for various body organs like heart. A study concluded that there are lower risk of heart disease in people take more gluten. Doctors and various study suggests that people with no celiac disease should not avoid gluten.
There’s no benefit to a gluten-free diet for people who aren’t sensitive to gluten. Many websites state benefits of a gluten-free diet. These benefits range from weight loss to improved heart health. None of these sites backed up their claims with scientific research. More credible sites consistently state that there’s no scientific research to back up these claims. Right now, there’s no evidence that supports the benefits of a gluten-free diet in people who aren’t sensitive to gluten.
<span>In humans, oogenesis
in comparison to spermatogenesis is different in that the temperature they have.
Female puberty typically occurs much later than the age of male puberty oocyte
production works best at cooler temperatures than those that support
spermatogenesis oogenesis continues throughout life, but spermatogenesis
typically ends.</span>
