"<span>Women in America had fewer rights than French women after the revolution" might be a plausible argument, but it should be noted that the French Revolution amounted in far more internal deaths than the American Revolution, making it hard to argue that it was more liberating.</span>
Answer:
B
Explanation:
They are not the president so not executive and they are not judges so not judicial. It would have to legislative
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (Tratado de Guadalupe Hidalgo in Spanish), officially titled the Treaty of Peace, Friendship, Limits and Settlement between the United States of America and the Mexican Republic,[1]
is the peace treaty signed on February 2, 1848, in the Villa de Guadalupe Hidalgo (now a neighborhood of Mexico City) between the United States and Mexico that ended the Mexican–American War (1846–1848). The treaty came into force on July 4, 1848.[2]
Although Mexico ceded Alta California and Santa Fe de Nuevo México, the text of the treaty (3)did not list territories to be ceded, and avoided the disputed issues that were causes of war: the validity of the 1836 secession of the Republic of Texas, Texas's unenforced boundary claims as far as the Rio Grande, and the 1845 annexation of Texas by the United States.
Comparing the boundary in the Adams–Onís Treaty to the Guadalupe Hidalgo boundary, Mexico conceded about 55% of its pre-war, pre-Texas territorial claims[4) and now has an area of 1,972,550 km² (761,606 sq mi).
Articles VIII and IX ensured safety of existing property rights of Mexican citizens living in the transferred territories. Despite assurances to the contrary, the property rights of Mexican citizens were often not honored by the U.S. in accordance with modifications to and interpretations of the Treaty.[5][6][7]
the no in brackets is the terms
Writers of historical fiction often try to appeal to readers by blending historical facts with imaginary plots and characters :)
