1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
just olya [345]
4 years ago
4

Which statement(s) below did Thurgood Marshall use to argue against segregation of public schools in Brown v. Board of Education

?
Check all of the boxes that apply.

It denied African Americans equal protection of the law.

It violated the Thirteenth Amendment.

It made African American children feel inferior.

It created “separate but equal” facilities.
History
2 answers:
Kitty [74]4 years ago
5 0

<u>The correct answers are the following:</u>

  • It denied African Americans equal protection of the law.
  • It made African American children feel inferior.

Brown v. Board of Education was a case that led to the enactment of a landmark decision by the US Supreme Court in 1954.  

The case was about the constitutionality of the "separate but equal" lemma that was accepted in a former decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1896 in the Plessy v. Ferguson case. Such decision allowed the proliferation of segregated schools under the belief that, if facilities were equal in quality, such education system was not violating the equality of rights provision that had been guaranteed for all US citizens by the Reconstruction Amendments to the US Constitution.  

Brown v. Board of Education<u> overturned the abovementioned previous Supreme Court decision and declared segregation unconstitutional, claming that, in practice, it actually made black students feel inferior.</u> The court published a deadline and all schools nationwide had to abolish such practice and to adopt racial integration.

Orlov [11]4 years ago
3 0

Correct statements to check:

<h2> It denied African Americans equal protection of the law.</h2><h2>It made African American children feel inferior.</h2>

Historical context:

Thurgood Marshall argued on behalf of the plaintiffs (black students seeking access to all-white schools) when the cases grouped under Brown v. Board of Education were brought before the Supreme Court in 1952-1953. At the time, Thurgood Marshall was the head of the Legal Defense and Educational Fund of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).  

The decision of the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education (decided 1954), agreed with the arguments made by Thurgood Marshall. The Court ruled that all Americans are entitled to the same civil liberties and equal protections in regard to access to education. Until that decision, it was legal to segregate schools according to race, so that black students could not attend the same schools as white students.  An older Supreme Court decision, Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality.  In the case of Brown v. Board of Education, that standard was challenged and defeated.  Segregation was shown to create inequality and to cause psychological harm to black children.  The Court's decision included this statement:  "To separate them [children in grade and high schools] from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely to ever be undone."

The Court's ruling affirmed that the 14th Amendment applies to all rights and privileges of citizens, including access to  education.  Section 1 of the 14th Amendment reads as follows:

  • <em> All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.</em>
You might be interested in
HELP...
yawa3891 [41]

Answer: True

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did it take the states so long to ratify the Articles of Confederation
Marizza181 [45]
The reason why it takes a long time to ratify the Articles of Confederation is that U.S. just declared independent from Britain, in other words, they just passed the Declaration of Independence, and in order to keep a country on track, they need some sorts of form of government, and they don't want to repeating the history, or have another tyrant, or a king, to rule over them again, which is a part of reason why they declared independent (the actual reasons is the king taxes us for no reason and we can't participate in the government), so they need all of the 13 states to approve, or sign, the Articles of Confederation, majority of them signed it, some of them having issues about the rights in the Articles of Confederation, so someone, I forgot his name, promised to includes all of the rights into the Articles of Confederation, which they can't do it instantly, which later known as the Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments), so it takes longer to get the whole Articles of Confederation to be approved, or ratified.

Hope this help, my English is not that well so please excuse for it.

8 0
4 years ago
Which river flows through the northeastern edge of the Sahara desert
Lena [83]

the Nile river flows  northeastern edge of the Sahara desert
4 0
4 years ago
What appeasement have Britain the chance to build up
Alina [70]
"Appeasement is a diplomatic policy aimed at avoiding war by making concessions to an aggressor." 

Prior to World War Two the British and French tried Appeasing Hitler by agreeing to return the Sudentenland for example to Germany and didn't interfere or prevent the Germans from reoccupying the Rhineland. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeasement 
In the process by avoiding conflict the Brits were able to ready for a possible war and better able to deal with it once it happened; example being perfecting radar prior to the Battle of Britain. 

Hope that helps :)
4 0
3 years ago
During the Middle Ages the practice of witchcraft was widely regarded as what?
belka [17]

Answer:

D None of the

Explanation:

Witches were considered Satan's followers, members of an antichurch and an antistate, the sworn enemies of Christian society in the Middle Ages.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • During the Taiping Rebellion, who rebelled?
    12·1 answer
  • What is detente ??????,,,,,,,????????
    9·2 answers
  • Which event is considered the immediate cause of World War I?
    13·1 answer
  • 1. Neanderthals were killed off by Homo erectus. <br><br> True or false
    5·2 answers
  • During the Renaissance, an artist who was considered a "Renaissance man" because of his expertise in several areas was
    6·2 answers
  • 1.How do you describe the geographical location of the Philippines?
    7·1 answer
  • Samuel Adams formed a secret organization to protect the rights of the colonists. What was it called?​
    9·1 answer
  • !!!!!!!PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Identify all of the CORRECT statements about the Leo Frank case and its impact on society in the South:
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement is correct concerning the Emancipation Proclamation (1863)?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!