Based on historical perspective, the South tried to justify the "<u>Chàttel Slàvery</u> by arguing that keeping slavery was a matter of states' rights, but the South also favored <u>Fúgitive Slàve Law</u> which took away Northern States' rights to protect enslaved people who had escaped to the North.
<h3>What is Chàttel Slàve?</h3>
The chàttel slàve is the form of slavery arrangement whereby an individual has the ownership of another man to work for him as he pleases, either at home or in fields.
During the debate on the abolition of slàvery between North and South, the Southern States argued that chàttel slàvery is no different than wage slàvery, and it should be the state's right to determine whether to be a slàve state or free state.
Again, during the debate, the south argued in favor of the <u>Fugitivé Slàve Law.</u> This law mandated Northerners to turn escaped slàves who moved to the North back over to their Southern owners, though it was against their rights to protect enslaved people.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Chàttel Slàvery and Fugitíve Slàve Law accordingly.
Learn more about the Fugítive Slàve Law here: brainly.com/question/9505313
The Golden Age of China is thought to have been the time of Tang dynasty, between the years 618 and 907. It was a time of reforms and development in art, literature, architecture and others areas.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same cartoon you posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be a "carpetbagger" since it shows someone from the North coming to the South after the Civil war, mostly likely to take advantage of the crippled economy. </span></span>
In Germany at the Castle Church in Wittenberg
The Fourth Estate was made up of peasants and city workers.
The Fourth Estate also contained bourgeoisie, which were people who had wealth that they had acquire, but did not have a noble title through hereditary or military means.
