1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AlexFokin [52]
3 years ago
10

Feuding brothers is common in stories, folk tales, and myths from around the world. Tell why you think having a pair of arguing

brothers in the story makes it more compelling. Tell why you think the Romans enjoyed the story of the feuding brothers. What does it add to the story?
History
2 answers:
wolverine [178]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Check the explanation

Explanation:

Tales and stories of Feuding brothers are common in many cultures all around the world sometimes the stories are true while some are just myth.

The Romans enjoys the feuding brothers stories because they believe that everything comes at a cost and that family will always fight, and that one should never try to kill to get what you want.

ANEK [815]3 years ago
7 0
<h2>It is not certain if these twin brothers were real, but their story was treated with respect and discussed at length even by the ancients.</h2>

Explanation:

There is much debate on whether feuding brothers were real men or simply a myth or even a combination of both.

Their feats and adventures are far-fetched, some scholars confirm that their characters may be based on some historic foundation. Foundation myths are often involved with aspects of fiction and non-fiction.

It describes that everything comes at a cost and fight is common in each family. That doesn't mean anyone should try to kill to get what you want.

The story explains that ambition and jealous always lead to conflict or feuding. Any kind of struggle or desire for power is a part of human nature.

You might be interested in
- Which of the following refers to a serious crime that normally has a punishment of more than a year in jail? A misdemeanor B.
ikadub [295]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
What was the effect of the Zimmerman telegram on world war 1?
natima [27]

it helped convince U.S. leaders to send american troops to fight in Europe

6 0
4 years ago
5) What 3 things made up the "triple wall of privilege"?
anyanavicka [17]

Explanation:

the tariff, the banks and the trusts

8 0
2 years ago
Select all that apply.
Allushta [10]
It is the first, second, and last I believe
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain and elaborate on TWO ways in which life in the Soviet Union was improved under Gorbachev, from how life had been under S
Free_Kalibri [48]

Gorbachev's reforms are ultimately responsible for the Soviet collapse, which saw the end of Soviet superpower status, a massive reduction in the Soviet military's size and strength, the unilateral evacuation of all territories in Central and Eastern Europe occupied at great human cost in the Second World War, and a rapidly declining economy fragmented into fifteen separate states. Much of the argument that the Soviet political system and economy needed reform needed change to avoid collapse came directly from him - the phrase "Era of Stagnation" to describe the Brezhnev years is actually a piece of Gorbachev's rhetoric. However there seems to be a strong case (made by Stephen Kotkin in Armageddon Averted), that while the Soviet economy was growing at ever slower rates, and increasingly unable to close the ever-present gap in living standards between the USSR and the West, probably could have continued to muddle on - there was no imminent danger of political and economic collapse in 1985. It's also important to note that Gorbachev's reforms did not cause the collapse of the USSR on purpose, and Gorbachev was always committed to maintaining the union in some reformed shape under an economic system that was still socialist. However, his reforms both began to pick apart the centralized economy without really creating new institutions, which caused severe economic disruptions, and his political reforms unleashed new political movements outside his control, while all of these reforms antagonized more hardline members of the nomenklatura (party establishment). Ultimately he lost control of the situation. The Soviet system was highly-centralized and governed in a top-down approach, and it was Gorbachev who put reforms into motion and also removed members of the Soviet government and Communist party who opposed reforms. Gorbachev's period tends to get divided into roughly three periods: a period of reform, a period of transformation, and a period of collapse. The period of reform lasted roughly from 1985 to 1988, in which Gorbachev and his supporters in the government (notably Eduard Shevardnadze, Gorbachev's foreign minister and the future President of Georgi, and Aleksandr Yakovlev, Gorbachev's ally on the Politburo and the intellectual driver of reforms) tried a mixture of moderate reforms and moral suasion to revitalize the Soviet economy as it was, echoing Khrushchev's reforms of 20 years previous. While the goal was a revitalization of Soviet society and the economy, there was a very strong focus on morality: this period notably featured the anti-alcoholism/prohibition campaign, and very public campaigns against corruption (Dmitry Furman called this a "sort of Marxist Protestantism"). When these efforts did not secure the results that Gorbachev and his reformers desired, more far-reaching reforms were pursued in the 1988-1990 period. This is when Gorbachev made massive changes to Soviet foreign policy, such as withdrawing from Afghanistan in 1989, announcing unilateral cuts to military spending and forces at the UN in 1988, and more or less cutting the USSR's Eastern European satellite states in 1989. On the domestic sphere, this is when Gorbachev pushed through major political changes to the Soviet system, pushing through a new Congress of People's Deputies to be filled through semi-free elections, removing the Communist Party's monopoly of power and creating the office of President of the USSR for himself in 1990. This is also the period when glasnost ("openness", ie the lifting of censorship) took off, and these all were largely attempts to establish a new base of support for continued reforms once it became clear to Gorbachev that most of the Communist Party was uninterested in this. These reforms ushered in the 1990-1991 chaos, at which point Gorbachev essentially lost control. Falling oil prices and the crackdown on alcohol sales (which were a massive part of the Soviet budget), plus Gorbachev's loosening of management and sales restrictions on state firms while maintaining most of their subsidies, plus plans for importing of new Western machine tools and technology to revitalize the economy, seriously destabilized the Soviet budget, and caused the government to turn to the printing presses to cover ever increasing deficits.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Among the first settlers of the Oregon country, after trappers, were the _____. (1 point)
    13·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the thirteenth amendment?
    10·2 answers
  • which of the following is not an element of baroque a movement b columns c ornamentation c minimalism ​
    12·1 answer
  • The right answer will get brainiest
    7·1 answer
  • Who wrote the mystery document? <br><br> The author of the mystery document is Upton Sinclair.
    13·1 answer
  • Which type of warfare was first used in the Battle of the Marne?
    11·1 answer
  • Name
    5·2 answers
  • In the 2000 presidential election, George W. Bush won the electoral vote, but his opponent, Al Gore, won the popular vote. in 20
    9·1 answer
  • 1)
    9·1 answer
  • Help help history history
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!