Answer:
$21.17
Step-by-step explanation:
Simple Interest=P(1+r)^t
Compounded Interest=P(e^rt)
SI=668*(1.0925)^5
SI=1039.64
CI=668(e^(0.0925*5))
CI=1060.81
1060.81-1039.64=21.17
So the difference is $21.17, thus doing compounded interest is better.
Answer:
i dont know what level this is
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
21
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Step 1: add 2 to 5</em>
=> 2 + 5
=> 7
<em>Step 2: Multiply the result by 3:</em>
=> 7 * 3
=> 21
Therefore the <u>final answer = 21</u>
Hope this helps!
<span>If the relationship is x+4 then
f(5)=5+4
f(5)=9
as an example
</span>
Answer:
Option A
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that in a study of the relationship between geographical mobility (number of times a person has changed residences) and number of friends, Pearson's r^2 is reported as .40.
r square, being the coefficient of determination explains the variablity of one variable due to the variability of the other. Here Mobility explains 40% variation in the number of friends is right answer.
Option B is wrong because r = ±6324, so cannot say positive or negative.
Similarly option c is wrong because we are unsure whether negative correlation. Option d is wrong since 16% is not right .
