If the government <u>fails</u> to protect its citizens, these citizens have the fundamental right to <u>revolt</u>.
<h3>What is government?</h3>
Government is a body of leadership and procedures that's saddled with the responsibility of establishing laws and policies, enforcing rules and regulations in a particular society, especially in a democratic country.
<h3>Who is a citizen?</h3>
A citizen can be defined as a terminology that is used to describe or qualify an individual (person) who is legally recognized by the law (constitution) to be a member of a particular country either by birth or naturalization.
According to the Constitution typically used in a democratic government, we can infer and logically deduce that it is very important for the government of the day to protect the citizens at all times.
However, if the government <u>fails</u> to protect its citizens, these citizens have the fundamental right to <u>revolt</u>.
Read more on citizens here: brainly.com/question/21140417
#SPJ1
I belive it’s counter claim or rebuttal
Answer:
not able to produce enough food
Explanation:
the society was increased to the population villages and towns but the more the food is being made and not being shared with the other people the more people will starve.
Answer:
to persuade Parliament that simply because she has a child does not guarantee that the child will be a competent ruler
Explanation:
THESE ARE THE OPTIONS FOR THE QUESTION
to persuade Parliament that the method of choosing successors to the throne based simply on birthright needs to be revised
to persuade Parliament that her child should not be considered a possible choice for successor to the English throne
to persuade Parliament that simply because she has a child does not guarantee that the child will be a competent ruler
to persuade Parliament how catastrophic it could be if they acted ungraciously toward her or her child
Queen Elizabeth's purpose as regards to the excerpt is that she was persuasive towards the Parliament, and this because she knows that having a child is not a yardstick that the particular child will grown to become a
competent ruler.
