1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
julsineya [31]
2 years ago
14

Which Axis leader during World War II is NOT correctly matched with his country?

History
2 answers:
Marrrta [24]2 years ago
8 0
The answer should be D because I am sure that the other ones match
mr_godi [17]2 years ago
7 0

The answer would be D. Mussolini was the leader of fascist Italy

You might be interested in
How did the make-up of the Roman Senate change over time?
vladimir1956 [14]

First it's important to think about the complications involved with the word “empire.” Rome was an empire (country ruling over other countries) before the first emperor, but the word derives from imperator, the name used by Augustus. But it meant “wielder of military power,” a kind of uber-general and was specifically not supposed to connote the idea of an emperor as we think of it today (the goal was to avoid being called a king or being seen as one). Earlier, Augustus was known as <span>dux </span>(leader) and also, later <span>princeps </span>(first citizen). As far as I know, in the days of the republic, Rome called the provinces just provinciaeor socii or amici, without a general term for their empire unless it was imperium romanum, but that really meant the military power of Rome (over others) without being a reference to the empire as a political entity. It didn’t become an empire because of the emperors, and the way we use these words now can cloud the already complicated political situation in Rome in the 1st century BC.

The point is this: the Roman Republic did have an empire as we conceive it, but the Senate was unwilling to make changes that would have enabled it to retain power over the empire. By leaving it to proconsuls to rule provinces, they allowed proconsuls, who were often generals of their armies whether they were actually proconsul at any given time or not, to accrue massive military power (imperium) that could be exerted over Rome itself. (This, by the way, is in part the inspiration behind moving American soldiers around so much—it takes away the long-term loyalty a soldier may have toward a particular general.)

So the Senate found itself in no position to defy Caesar, who named himself the constitutional title of dictator for increasing periods until he was dictator for life, or Octavian (later named Augustus), who eventually named himself imperator.

The Senate had plenty of warning about this. The civil wars between Sulla and Marius gave plenty of reason for it to make real changes, but they were so wedded to the mos maiorum (tradition of the ancestors) that they were not willing to address the very real dangers to the republic that their constitution, which was designed for a city-state, was facing (not that I have too many bright ideas about what they could have done).

To finally come around to the point, the Senate went from being the leading body of Rome to being a rubber stamp on whatever the imperator wished, but there was no single moment when Rome became an empire and the Senate lost power, and these transformations don't coincide.

For one thing, the second triumvirate was legally sanctioned (unlike the informal first triumvirate), so it was a temporary measure—it lasted two 5-year terms— and the time Octavian spent as dux was ambiguous as to where he actually stood or would stand over the long term (in 33 BC, the second term of the second triumvirate expired, and he was not made imperator until 27). When he named himself imperator, he solidified that relationship and took on the posts of consul and tribune (and various combinations of posts as time went on).

If we simplify, we would say that the Senate was the leading body of Rome before the first emperor and a prestigious but powerless body afterwards, though senators were influential in their own milieus.

One other thing to keep in mind is that Octavian’s rise to Caesar Imperator Augustus Was by no means peaceful and amicable. He gets a reputation in many people’s minds as dictatorial but stable and peaceful, but the proscriptions of the second triumvirate were every bit as bloody and greedy as those of Sulla. Ironically, it was Julius Caesar who was forgiving to his former enemies after he named himself dictator. Augustus did end widespread killings and confiscations after becoming imperator, but that was only after striking fear into everyone and wiping out all his enemies, including the likes of Cicero<span>.</span>

6 0
3 years ago
What was the main result of the wannsee conference in january 1942?
Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer:

The Wannsee Conference was a meeting of Nazi officials informing the German authorities of the "final solution of the Jewish question". The decision had been made earlier, and the Wannsee Conference was a press conference, demonstrating that the genocide had become part of the official policy of the country. The meeting took place on 20 January 1942 in a villa on the shore of Lake Wannsee in the southwestern suburbs of Berlin. The final solution policy led to the Holocaust, the genocide of the Jews.

3 0
3 years ago
In which part of the United States did women first begin to get the right to vote?
fredd [130]
I think it was the South. Not exactly sure though.
3 0
3 years ago
Do you agree that Aurngazeb political ambitions and policies led to the decline if the Mugal empire? Justify​
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Before tracing the rise of British prominence in the Middle East after 1798, it is important to note the historical antecedents of Britain's involvement in the region as well as the political and economic condition of the Ottoman Empire and Iran on the eve of Britain's ascendance. As early as 1580, English merchants (like their Venetian, French, and other European counterparts) secured formal commercial privileges for trading in the Ottoman Empire (and later gained comparable rights in Iran). Called capitula…

3 0
3 years ago
Who proposed the albany plan of union in 1754
natali 33 [55]
Benjamin Franklin was the one who did this.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why didnt the united states trust the soviet union?
    11·1 answer
  • Who was the first man on the sun?
    7·1 answer
  • Independence leaders were inspired by the _ and _ revolutions
    6·2 answers
  • Models are most often used to
    15·1 answer
  • What made Liberia and Ethiopia unique
    10·1 answer
  • Hair structure beneath the skin’s surface, known as
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes a major difference between the systems of manorialism and European economic systems that develo
    11·2 answers
  • In the late 1800's and early 1900's, why did most immigrants to the United States settle in urban areas?
    12·2 answers
  • How does Mr. Kraler feel about Mr. Frank?
    7·1 answer
  • What did the Supreme Court rule in the Dred Scott case?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!