Answer:
Both are correct
Explanation:
It is nature-nurture controversy or debate which focuses on an individual's personal behavioral traits to be a product or result of either genetics inheritance or acquired influences.
On one side, some psychologist and other natural sciences argue that behavioral traits and characteristics of a person can be explained by genetics as nature is per- wiring.
On the other hand, other social sciences and sociologist argues that human behavior is learned and shaped through social interaction and nurture.
Thus both genetics and human interaction and environment contributes to the human behavior.
Therefore, both the views are correct.
This question is missing the options. I've found them online. They are the following:
A. response reinforcing
B. dissonance
C. balance
D. feedback
E. fear appeal
Answer:
In an attempt to use B. dissonance to convince people to stop smoking, government officials have proposed removing all brand identification from packs of cigarettes, replacing it with graphic images of damaged lungs and cancerous mouths.
Explanation:
It is natural for us to try to remain in a state of cognitive consistency in order to function mentally in the real world. Cognitive consistency is a state of harmony between our beliefs and our behaviors. On the other hand, <u>cognitive dissonance is the discomfort we feel when our beliefs and behaviors are not in harmony. That happens when we receive new information that goes against our previous belief.</u>
<u>By replacing brand identification with graphic images or damaged lungs, officials are trying to provoke cognitive dissonance in smokers</u>. Once they see the pictures and receive the information that smoking is the cause behind those diseases, they begin to question their own behavior. <u>Suddenly, smoking may feel less enjoyable, since they are aware that their actions are causing them to get sick.</u>
They extend from our shore into the continental shelf. Not to mention, we have an EEZ, or exclusive economic zone, which extends about 200 nautical miles from our shores. In this area, we have full economic jurisdiction.
Answer:
The correct answer is: true
.
Explanation:
The Sinyavsky-Daniel trial was a trial against two Russian writers, Andrei Sinyavsky and Yuli Daniel, for publishing their satirical writings about the Soviet Union abroad.
The trial took place in Moscow, in February 1966, and the writers were sentenced to seven and five years in labor camps.
The writers used fake pseudonyms, Abram Tertz and Nikolai Arzhak, to write about anti-Soviet agitation and propaganda. Their publications – <em>This is Moscow Speaking</em> and <em>The Trial Begins</em> caught the attention of the KGB, so they were arrested in 1965.
2x - 10/4 = 3x
2x - 2.5 = 3x
-2.5=x
X = -2.5
