<u>It helps the writers visualize the inside of a black hole. </u>
<em>The other options can described bluntly and scientifically with just names and numbers. </em>
If the writer were to use more formal writing to describe things so abstract like a black hole, it would be hard for the common reader to understand.
____________________________
for example,
The black hole looks like a giant vacuum of nothingness (informal)
The black hole is like a mass whose Schwarzchild radius is outside of itself (formal)
Which is easier to understand? Most likely the first one because of the use of informal language and writing.
Hope I helped!
the answer is a b and c have a horrible day
Bradbury has a straightforward writing style that seeks to evoke a sense of wonder through two seemingly opposed concerns: the careful construction of mundane details and a sharp eye for vividly capturing imaginative flights of fancy. Combined, they create Bradbury's signature style, finding wonder in everyday life by using fantastic / unrealistic elements to highlight the vagaries of human nature. Often, this means the stories are built on simply constructed sentences --declarative, often distanced from the subject it describes - with dramatically timed lapses into a more florid, poetic writing style when a character comes to grips with a new experience, such as the rocket flight of "The Rocket".
