Answer:
Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria.
Alexander wasn’t “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.
Alexander was “great” because he was smart enough to cross the river and use Porus’ own elephants against him.
Alexander was not “great” because he tricked a ruler and killed many men in war only because he was greedy and wanted more land.
Alexander was most likely very religious, and it seems that in Ancient Greek anyone seeking refuge in a temple should be shown mercy. Also, if Alexander had killed everyone in the city than there would have been no point in conquering the city except for land.
if we summarize it so then we will get some main points
means for summarize just pick main points from it and join it for make a sentence so let's start
<u><em>,Great Britain had complete control over our trade with other countries. All items that we wished to trade had to first pass through Great Britain.for imposing taxing on us ,for depriving us for the benefit of trial by jury, for transporting us for pretended offences and for abolishing the free system of english in a neighboring province, establishing there in an Arbitary government and enlarging its boundaries rentend it at fit instrument for introducing the same absolute ryle into these colonies</em></u>
Answer is <span>D. The Caribbean</span>
C. Planned economy
Planned economy is an economic system where the government has control over the production and pricing of goods and services.
Answer:
Strict scrutiny is a form of judicial review that courts use to determine the constitutionality of certain laws. ... To pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a "compelling governmental interest," and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.
