<em>Answer:</em>
<em>postconventional</em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>In psychology,</em><em> the term postconventional morality is described as one of the different levels in the theory of moral development which was proposed by one of the great psychologists named Lawrence Kohlberg. </em>
<em>According to Lawrence Kohlberg, </em><em>postconventional morality is the third and the highest level in the theory of moral development whereby an individual tends to develop his or her personal set of morals and ethics that he or she uses to carry out or led a specific behavior.</em>
<em>As per the question, Kohlberg would suggest that this illustrates the postconventional morality.</em>
Answer:
modern style
Explanation:
Modern style -
It refers to the process of adding or substituting new features according to the taste of present generation , is referred to as the modern style .
The process require using the latest and innovative technique or method , to adapt modern style .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
Adapting new technique and geometrics , hence , showcase the use of the modern style .
Answer:
No impact.
Explanation:
In some countries, states do not have the autonomy to formulate their own laws. The US is not one of those. In the state territory, although there are laws that apply throughout the country, each state can formulate its own laws and these must be followed within the limits of the state and punishable by those who disobey. The law of each state must be judged in its home state and cannot be imposed on another state that does not accept that law as the rule to be followed. Thus, in relation to the above question, we can conclude that if state law in the neighboring state requires that interrogation be recorded on video, that law has no impact on state interrogation that does not require such recording.
Answer:
For the Jeffersonian Republicans, it was necessary to bring some different ideas to their mind after 1801, they accepted some federalist ideas due to the fact that after the government of Jefferson and Madison it was hard to distinguish between the ideas of the two parties
Explanation:
For the Jeffersonian Republicans, it was necessary to bring some different ideas to their mind after 1801, they accepted some federalist ideas due to the fact that after the government of Jefferson and Madison it was hard to distinguish between the ideas of the two parties, since they had to share a lot of concepts for the constitution's construction. Jefferson for example, adopted some federalist conceptions when he bought some land that he was offered for the benefit of the country. He did so, even though the constitution was not strictly established or allowed for the purchase of land by the president.
On the other hand, at the same time the federalists adopted a strict constructionist position, arguing that the purchase of land by the president was not allowed by the constitution.
Also Madison, who was considered a federalist, acted according to republicans ideas when he refused to sign a congress project that proposed to destinate some money for the construction of roads, he said that idea was against the constitution and he had to reject it.
That is why, at that moment of politics it was hard to distinguish the ideas of the two parties that had been before so strict, but at that moment everything changed.
