Answer: three times as large
Explanation:
Economic order quantity will be calculated as follows:
EOQ = ✓(2DS/H)
D = Demand in units
Here S = Ordering cost = $10
H = Holding cost
Since S = $10
Therefore, EOQ will be:
= ✓(2DS/H)
= ✓(2 × 10 × D/ H)
= ✓(20D/H)
Since we're to increase the order cost from $10 per order to $90 per order, then EOQ will be:
Since S = $90
Therefore, EOQ will be:
= ✓(2DS/H)
= ✓(2 × 90 × D/ H)
= ✓(180D/H)
3✓20DH
The revised EOQ will then be 3 times as large.
Answer:
X=97.24
Explanation:
PV = Present Value = X+2000 by the 16th years
PMT = Payments = $100
FV = Future Value = 2000 at the end of 16 years
n= number of years
Applying the equation of future value for annuity
FV = pmt* ((1+r)ⁿ - 1
)/r
Inputting the values;
2000=100*((1+r)¹⁶-1)/r
Solving for r, gives r = 2.9%
Therefore using the formula for PV for annuity;
PV=PMT*(1-(1/1+r)/r)
X=100*(1-(1/1.029)/0.029
X=100*((1-0.9718)/0.029)
X=100*(0.0282/0.029)
X=97.24
Answer:
<u>low opportunity cost</u>
Explanation:
<u>Opportunity cost</u> is described as a process in which an individual sacrifices something when they tend to choose one thing or option over another option or thing.
<u>Low opportunity cost: </u>The term "low opportunity cost" is determined as the possibility of an individual's chosen investment returns to be lower than the forgone investment's returns.
Answer:No, Lake source cooling is not economically advantageous.
Explanation:
The cost of the lake source cooling is S30 greater than the cost of the refrigerator.
Though the lakes source option will bring additional income of S2400 for ten years this will only reduce it's cost to S2900 and this is still higher than the total cost of the refrigerator option of S2,120.
The straight line depreciation option on both options will not change this decision since it will have the same effect on both options.
Answer:
B. singing a writing communicates the seriousness of the occasion to the singer
