If im not wrong the answer should be yes
My answer will be that, in the first place, I would make a detailed study of the mammal species to be protected, followed by the necessary resources, not only for their subsistence, but to allow them to reproduce.
Afterwards, we proceed with the acquisition of the land taking into account factors such as the protection of the habitat and its recovery (characteristic vegetation of the protected species avoiding, for example, the use of pesticides).
Once the mammals feel comfortable, we could proceed with the reproduction, verifying the evolution of the offspring, achievements and deficiencies.
It would be A) 25%
because as long usually if the dad isn't colorblind then the child won't get colorblind because usually when having a child the child gets most of the dads genes if that makes sense
<span>An area that has a suitable habitat subdivided into small fragments separated by unsuitable areas of habitat would not be ecologically diverse. This would typically be the type of environment that would have a large number of the same type of organisms, since the fragments are smaller than would be optimal.</span>