1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marin [14]
3 years ago
13

As a result of the Munich Agreement, Hitler promised to

History
2 answers:
VashaNatasha [74]3 years ago
7 0
Hitler had promised British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and the German people that the Sudetenland would be his "last territorial demand" in Europe. In reality, it was only the beginning. And Hitler now wanted to grab the remainder of Czechoslovakia due to its strategic importance.
stiks02 [169]3 years ago
4 0
Hitler promised that he would overturn the treaty with Versailles and stop reparations and to give Germany back her pride.
You might be interested in
What agency was created by the United States Congress in 1865 to set up schools and churches, supply food and clothing, and solv
steposvetlana [31]
B. The Freedmen's Bureau
4 0
3 years ago
Pennsylvania and Delaware were colonies given in a payment of debts true or false?
Vinvika [58]
The answer i will be true
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What similarity do the American and Soviet telegraphs share?
algol [13]

The answer is: Both present the other nation as a threat to their security.

Telegraphs are systems that were set to transmit message in the past, often in coded signals. As Soviet is mentioned, we can also deduce that the period was during cold war.

Let's look into the options one by one:

Both explain how World War II affected their foreign policy.

-This is false.

-Their foreign policy was developed gradually after WWII, however, there was no need to explain how it affect their policy as telegraphs were mainly used to send commands and reports, therefore unlikely to mention about the issue above.

Both characterize the other nation as a police state.  

-This is false.

-A police state is where a state hold surveillance over another state and is acknowledged. This is definitely not the case during Cold War, as the two states were opposed against each other let alone characterizing or admitting the other nation as a police state.

Both present the other nation as a threat to their security.

-This is true.

-Holding two different ideologies, the two states was described as opposing camps. During the time, nuclear weapons were also developed which could cause great damage and had a large attacking range that reached directly to the opposing state, therefore they both saw each other as a threat.

Both support the creation of capitalist economies in Europe.

-This is false.

- Although America support capitalism, Soviet did not and supported communism.

Therefore the answer is both present the other nation as a threat to their security.

Hope it helps!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
British frustration with the American colonies during the French and Indian War cited all of the following factors EXCEPT:
Viktor [21]

Answer: C.) British officers were often forced to serve in subordinate roles to their colonial counterparts.

For the most part, this was the opposite. The frustration was on the part of the colonial forces as they were often forced to serve in subordinate roles.

The clash of command was a serious problem for the militias. British officers generally regarded themselves as higher than colonial ones, which colonial officers considered an offence. The solution was to divide each militia unit into smalled commands, and to recommisision militia officers with a rank of captain and above with a rank of captain. This demoted all the high-ranking colonial officers and placed them as subordinate to British captains. The new system was extremely unpopular with colonials and caused many of them to resign from the military.

3 0
3 years ago
What is a main reason that the alliance between Ousamequin’s people and the people of Plymouth ended?
Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

D. The settlers insisted on sharing the land.

Explanation:

As time passed, tens of thousands of settlers from New England came into the colony and so they had to expand the land where they settled. What caused a strain in the alliance with Native Indians was the fact that the English people wanted the Natives to give up their land for them.

To solve the problem they bought a large expanse of land from the Sachem or Massosoit who was the leader of the natives to accommodate their growing population. The expanse of land was about fourteen miles square.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the west ward exspansion affect native Americans
    9·2 answers
  • Help me <br> Events of the cold war
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the pilgrims create the Mayflower Compact?
    12·1 answer
  • What were the many roles of early chiefs?
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE SELECT FROM A OR B ONLY!!!!
    10·2 answers
  • Describe the dravidian’s economy
    14·1 answer
  • Why did Japan attack Pearl Harbor?
    12·2 answers
  • What was part of the agenda of southern democrats?
    12·2 answers
  • Study the map. what is the main subject of this map? the options are
    6·1 answer
  • 20 Points. Relationship between the revolutionary war and California?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!