1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry [639]
3 years ago
9

in what key is she didn't double dates have to compromise in order to create a constitution that most States would accept

History
1 answer:
MissTica3 years ago
5 0
Oct 19, 2016 - More<span> than 20 journalists across NPR fact checked their comments. ... Bernie Sanders said he </span>would have<span> a litmus test for Supreme Court justices. ... This is not Clinton's position, though </span>she does<span> favor stricter gun regulations. ... And the court </span>didn't accept<span> that reasonable regulation, but they've </span>accepted<span> .</span>
You might be interested in
The concept of voting rights is based on
omeli [17]

Answer:

It's primarily based on the Voting Rights Act of 1965. This prohibits the states and varied political events from placing voting skills or every other necessities with the intention to proceed with voting. Seize be aware that that is all for the sake of the Civil Rights of the citizen in order that everybody will find a way to own a good strategy to vote - no matter status and color.                    

                   

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What were the Intolerable acts? What were the actions that the colonists took to oppose them?
Anna35 [415]
The Intolerable Acts was a law passed by the British Parliament in order to punish the Bostonians for the Boston Tea Party, in largely because the amount of money the British lost due to the Tea Party. The Intolerable act led the colonist to come together and for the First Continental Congress, this was their first real solid move toward the Revolution and their own self governed state. <span />
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best describes the outcome of the bay of pigs invasion?
vaieri [72.5K]

The correct answer is d. it was a failure that was an embarrassment for the Kennedy administration. It was not only a complete military fiasco, it was a political debacle as the USA appeared to the world as aggressors and prompted the Soviets to increase their military aid to Cuba which would ultimately turn into the Cuban Missile Crisis barely a year later. The attempted invasion unified and solidified Cuban communists and radicalized Castro against the USA. Public opinion in most of Central and South America was that Americans were hypocrites who would parrot words as democracy, sovereignty and peaceful cooperation and then spearhead an invasion of reactionary, right-wing elements to a smaller Caribbean nation.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the spanish invasion transform the Americas?
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer: Native Americans were forced into slavery by the Spanish when they colonized the Americans.

Explanation: The Spanish established a system where pure Spanish people had all of the power and mixed races, or mestizos or Native Americans had little to no power.  The Spanish conquerors treated the Native Americans badly, but intermarriage between the groups blended Spanish and Indian elements.  They commanded local populations and forced Christianity upon them. Many came hoping to make a fortune.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the main reason President Monroe made this statement?
inn [45]

Answer: What motives were behind the Monroe Doctrine? The Monroe Doctrine was drafted because the U.S. government was worried that European powers would encroach on the U.S. sphere of influence by carving out colonial territories in the Americas.

Explanation:

(December 2, 1823), cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy enunciated by Pres. James Monroe in his annual message to Congress. Declaring that the Old World and New World had different systems and must remain distinct spheres, Monroe made four basic points: (1) the United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers; (2) the United States recognized and would not interfere with existing colonies and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere; (3) the Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization; and (4) any attempt by a European power to oppress or control any nation in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.

hope this helps have a nice day

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In response to growing violence, African Americans were most likely to run for public office to push for more rights and fairer
    10·1 answer
  • Before the agricultural revolution much of England's farmland was
    5·2 answers
  • The main reason the southern colonies were founded as whole
    9·1 answer
  • List and explain two results of the increase in trade in Europe
    6·1 answer
  • What was one of the lasting of the mongol empire and europe asia
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is FALSE?
    9·2 answers
  • The Ottoman, Mughal, &amp; Safavid empires were able to conquer neighboring people because they
    10·1 answer
  • What was one direct effect of World War II activities like those promoted by this poster?
    12·1 answer
  • Hi!! I have a question!
    8·2 answers
  • A value is defined as a person's decision about​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!