Answer:
Situational attribution.
Explanation:
Attribution is the cause of an event related to our behavior. Attribution is the concept related to making our world and experience make a sense. Attribution is a phenomenon that helps us to learn how a person is related to the things and relate to self from other things.
It is also predicted our future and behavior outcomes. For instance, if we hear that Mona is very reliable, then we attribute that she is reliable and we will share our secrets with her. In the above statement, Mary Alice makes an attribution related to the situation for that she believes that a complaint from the client towards her because they are less in number in staff.
The answer is Loss of Integrity.
If the set of data suffered from Loss of Integrity then we may conclude that some event as caused it to be corrupted or incorrectly altered. This may result in to a security violation. The meaning above is another definition for Loss of Integrity, wherein information is confidential an =d not for public view.
Answer:
The correct answer is: true
.
Explanation:
The Sinyavsky-Daniel trial was a trial against two Russian writers, Andrei Sinyavsky and Yuli Daniel, for publishing their satirical writings about the Soviet Union abroad.
The trial took place in Moscow, in February 1966, and the writers were sentenced to seven and five years in labor camps.
The writers used fake pseudonyms, Abram Tertz and Nikolai Arzhak, to write about anti-Soviet agitation and propaganda. Their publications – <em>This is Moscow Speaking</em> and <em>The Trial Begins</em> caught the attention of the KGB, so they were arrested in 1965.
Answer:
The answer is a cognitive miser.
Explanation:
The human mind can be considered a cognitive miser because people tend to solve different problems, as well as think to make less effort instead of using better and more sophisticated ways to do it.
This theory is related to the theory of cognition, which brings some previous research made in heuristics and attributional biases as a way to explain how and the reasons why people are cognitive misers. This term was established by Susan Fiske and Shelley Taylor in 1984 and it is considered an important element concerning social cognition theory.
Answer:
Thing.
Explanation:
The thing was the prehistoric assembly of Germanic and Norse councils. It was attended by free men from the community and was led by law readers who were familiar with previously decided laws. Today, the term is used in the name of many political and legal bodies in Northern Europe.
The Things met at regular intervals and elected chiefs and kings, and condemned them according to the laws remembered by the law-readers. In practice, the councils were dominated by the most influential and wealthy, but in theory they operated on a voice and man basis.
