1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bija089 [108]
3 years ago
10

Why westward expansion create more conflict between the north and south

History
1 answer:
Eva8 [605]3 years ago
3 0

In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans, and it doubled the size of the United States. To Jefferson, westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health: He believed that a republic depended on an independent, virtuous citizenry for its survival, and that independence and virtue went hand in hand with land ownership, especially the ownership of small farms. (“Those who labor in the earth,” he wrote, “are the chosen people of God.”) In order to provide enough land to sustain this ideal population of virtuous yeomen, the United States would have to continue to expand. The westward expansion of the United States is one of the defining themes of 19th-century American history, but it is not just the story of Jefferson’s expanding “empire of liberty.” On the contrary, as one historian writes, in the six decades after the Louisiana Purchase, westward expansion “very nearly destroy[ed] the republic.”

Manifest Destiny

By 1840, nearly 7 million Americans–40 percent of the nation’s population–lived in the trans-Appalachian West. Following a trail blazed by Lewis and Clark, most of these people had left their homes in the East in search of economic opportunity. Like Thomas Jefferson, many of these pioneers associated westward migration, land ownership and farming with freedom. In Europe, large numbers of factory workers formed a dependent and seemingly permanent working class; by contrast, in the United States, the western frontier offered the possibility of independence and upward mobility for all. In 1843, one thousand pioneers took to the Oregon Trail as part of the “Great Emigration.”

Did you know? In 1853, the Gadsden Purchase added about 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory to the United States and fixed the boundaries of the “lower 48” where they are today.

In 1845, a journalist named John O’Sullivan put a name to the idea that helped pull many pioneers toward the western frontier. Westward migration was an essential part of the republican project, he argued, and it was Americans’ “manifest destiny” to carry the “great experiment of liberty” to the edge of the continent: to “overspread and to possess the whole of the [land] which Providence has given us,” O’Sullivan wrote. The survival of American freedom depended on it.

Westward Expansion and Slavery

Meanwhile, the question of whether or not slavery would be allowed in the new western states shadowed every conversation about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had attempted to resolve this question: It had admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. More important, it had stipulated that in the future, slavery would be prohibited north of the southern boundary of Missouri (the 36º30’ parallel) in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase.

However, the Missouri Compromise did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. The Southern economy grew increasingly dependent on “King Cotton” and the system of forced labor that sustained it. Meanwhile, more and more Northerners came to believed that the expansion of slavery impinged upon their own liberty, both as citizens–the pro-slavery majority in Congress did not seem to represent their interests–and as yeoman farmers. They did not necessarily object to slavery itself, but they resented the way its expansion seemed to interfere with their own economic opportunity.

Westward Expansion and the Mexican War

Despite this sectional conflict, Americans kept on migrating West in the years after the Missouri Compromise was adopted. Thousands of people crossed the Rockies to the Oregon Territory, which belonged to Great Britain, and thousands more moved into the Mexican territories of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, American settlers in Texas joined with their Tejano neighbors (Texans of Spanish origin) and won independence from Mexico. They petitioned to join the United States as a slave state.

You might be interested in
When the Federal Reserve puts money into the banking system __________. short-term interest rates rise short-term interest rates
melamori03 [73]
When the Federal Reserve puts money into the banking system, "short-term interest rates fall" because there is more capital in the system, meaning banks are willing to take more risks.
7 0
4 years ago
BRAINLIESTTTT ASAP!!!!
DanielleElmas [232]
Gibbons v. Ogden,was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation. The case was argued by some of America's most admired and capable attorneys at the time. Exiled Irish patriot Thomas Addis Emmet and Thomas J. Oakley argued for Ogden, while U.S. Attorney General William Wirt and Daniel Webster argued for Gibbons.
4 0
3 years ago
What document had a list of colonist's grievances?
Airida [17]
Declaration of independence
5 0
3 years ago
NEED HELP! PLEASE & THANK YOU!
il63 [147K]
Tammany hall supported the democratic party, and started a pressure group to support it.
7 0
3 years ago
Why did the Articles of confederation take four years to ratify? What convinced the states to finically ratify it?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
Some of the states were confederate, meaning they didn't want a lot of government involvement, so they were against having a constitution because they wanted to be able to run the states how they wanted to. Hope this helped!
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Christian humanism build on the earlier ideas of scholasticism?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the primary purpose of the ten commandments​
    8·2 answers
  • Who wrote the leviathan in 1651?
    10·2 answers
  • Two ratios that are equivalent to 4:2
    12·2 answers
  • Which of these phrases best describes a uniting principle of the progressive era
    7·2 answers
  • This Great Depression poster highlights one of the largest public works projects of the era, the Tennessee Valley Authority. The
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the colonies had an economic system based on agricultural cash crop plantations? Southern Colonies. Northern Colonies.
    9·1 answer
  • Describe how the U.S. responded to the bombings at Pearl Harbor.
    14·2 answers
  • Liu Bang officially became the emperor of the Han dynasty in __________. A. 300 BCE B. 230 BCE C. 202 BCE D. 150 BCE
    9·2 answers
  • Can someone answer please
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!