All categories

3 years ago

The Buddha thought that we have attachments to things because, fundamentally,

Social Studies

2 answers:

Alenkinab [10]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The Buddha thought that we have attachments to things because,

fundamentally, humans have cravings for things that has not been reached or don't have yet.

Explanation:

Buddha was a philosopher, spiritual teacher and religious leaders who lived in ancient India. He was the founder of the Buddhism religion. He talked about attachement, clinging, grasping which is as a result of cravings or desires for things that have not been reached yet which lead to suffering. Suffering is as a result of cravings or personal desires.

Tom [10]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The Buddha thought that we have attachments to things because, fundamentally, we are impermanent and unstable beings, but we try in vain to cause permanence and stability in our lives.

Explanation:

Buddha believed that attachment is one of the main causes of human suffering. According to him, we tend to be attached not only to things, but also to people, which is equally harmful, because we are, fundamentally, impermanent and fickle, that is, everything in our life is subject to change. However, we spend our lives trying to change that, and in the search for permanence and constancy we get attached to things and this causes us suffering, because everything changes, spends, breaks and goes away. In this case, Buddha says, that if we were detached, we would be happier and more satisfied with our reality.

You might be interested in

Brandon was jumping rope in the house and his mother told him to go outside because jumping rope should not be done indoors. Wha

Airida [17]

Answer:

The discipline technique she was using was: <u>Redirecting behavior.</u>

Explanation:

Redirecting a behavior is to conduct or direct an unwanted behavior into a wanted behavior. Brandon's mother is teacing him by redirecting his behavior, explaining to him that jumping rope should be done outdoors.

5 0

3 years ago

PLS HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIST!

Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

Explanation:

It is not

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

My judgment that you are conscientious converges with the subsequent empirical fact that you arrive on time for all your class m

Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

Predictive validity.

Explanation:

This is a psychological term which is used go check the extent to which one form of test can be used in the prediction of the others outcome calculating the correlative coefficient which make up the calculation criterion.

In this psychological situation, this validity is seen to be used in helping to address certain questions, because as its name predictive validity implies, it well addresses how well a specific tool predicts future behavior. Experts have shown that is is calculated by the correlation coefficient between the results of the assessment and the subsequent targeted behavior. The stronger the correlation between the assessment data and the target behavior, the higher the degree of predictive validity the assessment possesses.

5 0

3 years ago

1, in a market economy the factors of production are (choose all that apply):

mr_godi [17]

Answer:

The factors of production are resources that are the building blocks of the economy; they are what people use to produce goods and services. Economists divide the factors of production into four categories: land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship.

4 0

3 years ago

what influences might cause a member of the house to vote against the wishes of the people in his or her district

Rufina [12.5K]

There are many influences that could potentially lead a member of the House of Representatives to vote against the wishes of the people in their district. Simply the member could think that their constituents are incorrect in their view or don't possess enough information so therefore, they decide not to vote in accordance with the views of their constituents. Another influence could be that of their political party or the elites in their party that wish for the member to vote a certain a way. Another influence could be special interest groups or lobbies that seek to sway the views of Congress Members. These are all factors that together or separately could make a member of Congress vote in opposition of their constituents views.

6 0

3 years ago