Answer:
They are true and unbiased.
Explanation:
Accurate facts are unbiased. They do not "pick sides" when it comes to a topic. Facts also must be true. It can't be telling false information or stretching the truth; stretching the truth is not being completely honest.
"Dogs are canines." is a fact.
"Dogs are the worst." is NOT a fact. It is an opinion.
McCarthyism is nothing more than a witch hunt. A lot of finger pointing and not a lot of proof. Both parties (Democrat & Republican) in the United States use this in todays world. Ill give examples of both and follow up with how it can be beneficial to each party.
Democrats: Accuse other politicians of being "racist" or "bigoted" just from political ideas and from certain members of the base. While it is not fact or true that Republicans are by policy racist, it is a word that is hated by people and has a negative connotation to it, forcing some to keep distance from said person
Republicans: Accuse other politicians of being "muslin lovers" or "muslins" themselves. We saw this for the entire Obama presidency. Congress and some Republican supporters would use the word "muslin" to describe the president in order to give a negative connotation towards Obama. This has some strong effectiveness due to the recent events (September 11th, 2001).
Both parties are trying to stick a negative idea/precedent/description about the opposition in order to sway votes. This tactic is very effective because not only will you sway votes, theres little repercussion in doing so because the people who disagree with you are not going to be swayed, but that voter in the middle who cares about one issue over the other (in this case racism over fear of muslims or vice versa fear of muslims over racism).
Either someone is intelligent enough to know the rhetoric between the two parties and votes by policy (unaffected / no positive or negative response), they don't care about either issue (unaffected / no positive or negative response), or someone is strongly in favor of one or the other (strong positive or negative response).
While there are some attempts that have been made and can be made that would be so egregious that most people have a negative response, but that rarely happens and would be deemed political suicide.
Hope this helps.
<span>Mora includes the poem in her speech to encourage her audience to remember their family history.
Mora's speech is about immigrants who want to blend into the new society so much that they completely delete their own family history and background. She is obviously against this, saying that we should be proud of where we come from and not try to eradicate every trace of our family history just to become Americanized.
</span>
We can choose the following synonyms to substitute the words in the sentences:
10. C. gathered
11. D. opening
12. B. sound
13. A. inspiring awe and wonder
<h3>What is the meaning of the words?</h3>
- The verb "to muster" means to assemble or collect something. Thus, we must choose the option that presents the same meaning (a synonym). In this case, letter C, "gathered" is the best one.
- A "breach" is a gap or a rupture on something, especially a wall or a barrier. The option that means the same is letter D, "opening".
- The idiom "hale and hearty" is used to refer to someone who is healthy and vigorous, especially when talking about older people. Among the options, the best one is B, "sound".
- Finally, we say someone is "formidable" when we find them impressive. With that in mind, we can see that the best option is letter A, "inspiring awe and wonder."
Learn more about synonyms here:
brainly.com/question/26105224
