At what federal level do we have term limits?

History

1 answer:

attashe74 [19]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Term limits in the United States apply to many offices at both the federal and state level, and date back to the American Revolution. 

 

Term limits, also referred to as rotation in office, restrict the number of terms of office an officeholder may hold. For example, according to the 22nd Amendment, the President of the United States can serve two four-year terms.

 

Research shows that legislative term limits increase legislative polarization, reduce the legislative skills of politicians, reduce the legislative productivity of politicians weaken legislatures vis-a-vis the executive,and reduce voter turnout. Term limits have not reduced campaign spending reduced the gender gap in political representation, increased the diversity of law-makers,or increased the constituent service activities of law-makers.Term limits have been linked to lower growth in revenues and expenditures.

Hope this helps!:3

You might be interested in

Which statements from the video best demonstrate President Obama's bias on the issue of gun control? Check all

Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

a,b,c,e

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Which of the following was NOT a reason for the U.S. Civil War?

sp2606 [1]

Answer:

Not B

Explanation:

Just took the test and its not B

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which is not a legacy of ancient greece? a advancements in geometry and physics b symmetry and balance in architecture c trial b

Otrada [13]

I have to say B. The rest were concepts made in Greece, by Greek philosophers, politicians, or mathematicians. An example for an advancement in math is the Pythagorean Theorem. I hope this helps!

5 0

3 years ago

What do you think was H.G. Wells' intent in these opening two paragraphs in the chapter on Islam?

Tom [10]

Answer: The answer is the 1st option.

Explanation: The first sentence in the passage above talks about predicting the possibility of Mongolian domination and then the rest of that paragraph backs this prediction by outlining how weak or fragmented much of the world was. So the author was suggesting that the world seemed to be ripe for conquest.

The second paragraph makes reference to ignoring the latent forces of the Arabian Desert" because Arabia would have seemed what it had been for times immemorial, the refuge of small and bickering nomadic tribes. This reinforces the idea that no one would have predicted a new, powerful empire to emerge from Arabia at that time.

3 0

2 years ago

Write an essay describing the quote in relation to the opinion of Rizal to the Katipunan’s Plan "To die and conquer is pleasant;

leva [86]

Answer:

To die and conquer is pleasant; but to die and be conquered is painful."

Explanation:

To die and conquer is pleasant but to die and be conquered is painful because living like a slave under invaders is very painful and shameful for the people who have self respect. Conquering a place is a very pleasant feeling but someone be conquered is a painful feeling. Those people having no self respect can live as a slave in order to save their life but those people who have self respect can't live as a slave. They prefer death instead of living as a slave so they revolt and fought for the freedom of theirselve and their country. So that's why the opinion of Rizal is correct. The kings in ancient times considered shameful to be conquered so that's why they fight till their death but can't accept the slavery of the conqueror.

3 0

3 years ago