Answer:
inferential claim, factual claim
Explanation:
A passage qualifies as an argument if it bears a factual claim and an inferential claim. A factual claim is a claim in the premise if an argument that is assumed to be true and a fact. An inferential claim is a conclusive part of an argument that supports a reasoning process and suggests that something derives from something or is an implication of something.
Answer:
1) What problems did they have?
King George and Parliament was upset that the Patriots rebelled against them. They were also upset because they helped the Americans so much and they wanted America to pay them back by giving them taxes.
2) What changes caused these problems?
The Patriots got angry of the taxes; the king and Parliament got mad when the patriots wouldn't listen to them. (rebelling, demanding freedom)
3) What did they do to solve these problems?
The Patriots demanded freedom and rebelled; the king and Parliament gave them heavy taxes.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is Inference.
In creating an inference, you need to find a reliable source to obtain a certain amount of data and information.
After that, you need to process that data/information with your personal knowledge and deductive reasoning in order to create a conclusion
Judaism encourages its faithful to be followers of God and to follow his concepts and adopt his characteristics. The most striking feature of this God is his holiness. In Judaism, God's holiness is very well defined and presented, for Jews, God is the true representation of what it is to be holy, perfect and infallible, and should be used as an example for human life, for that reason, it is correct to affirm that the sanctity of life is the most important law of Judaism.
However, judging holiness as a standard to be set for man is unattainable. This is because the human being is composed of flaws and defects, allowed by God Himself. Achieving holiness on a divine level is an unattainable level, since we have a sinful and impure nature. In this case, the ideal would be to encourage good works and love between people, than to charge them for standards that are impossible for their human nature.
Segregation was not done at one's will. It was enforced by law. Therefore the answer is false. (I'm sorry if I am wrong I haven't dug much into this subject lol)