1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alisha [4.7K]
4 years ago
8

20 Points

Social Studies
2 answers:
ad-work [718]4 years ago
7 0
The answers are b, a, b, c, d
Zarrin [17]4 years ago
4 0

The answere to number four is  b.convergent boundary

You might be interested in
Who are the four American presidents who lost the popular vote, but won the Electoral College?
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

Explanation:

1.John Quincy Adams (1824)

This is the first of two occasions when the man ultimately elected president first lost both the popular vote and the electoral vote.

Back in 1824, there were four contenders for the presidency, all members of the same Democratic-Republican party: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, William Crawford and Henry Clay.

When the votes were tallied, Andrew Jackson won a plurality of both the popular vote and the Electoral College. But to win the presidency, you need more than a plurality (the most electoral votes), you need a majority (more than half), and Jackson was 32 electoral votes shy of the mark. In cases where no presidential candidate wins a majority of electoral votes, the Constitution sends the vote to the House of Representatives. According to the 12th Amendment, the House can only vote on the top three vote-getters, which eliminated Clay from the running, but that didn’t stop Clay from allegedly wielding his influence as Speaker of the House. The House voted to make Adams president, even though Jackson had beaten Adams by 99 electoral votes to 84. Adams turned around and appointed Clay as his Secretary of State, infuriating Jackson, who accused his opponents of stealing the election in a corrupt bargain.

2.Rutherford B. Hayes (1876)

Similar to 1824, the election of 1876 wasn’t decided by the voters, but by Congress. This time, though, the Constitution didn’t have an answer to the electoral crisis at hand.  

The race was an ugly one between Republican Rutherford B. Hayes and Democrat Samuel Tilden, and when the votes were counted, Tilden won 184 electoral votes, exactly one vote shy of the majority needed at the time to win the presidency. Hayes only won 165, but 20 more electoral votes were still in dispute.

The Republicans objected to the results from Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina, since both parties claimed their candidate had won the states. What now? The Constitution had a backup plan if no candidate won a majority of electoral votes, but there was no such process for resolving a dispute.  

So Congress created a bipartisan Federal Electoral Commission composed of House representatives, senators and Supreme Court justices. The Commission voted to give all 20 disputed electoral votes to Hayes, who won the election by the thinnest of margins: 185 to 184.  

Why did the Commission decide to hand the election to Hayes, who had lost both the popular and electoral vote? Most historians believe there was a deal brokered between the two parties. The Democrats, whose stronghold was the South, agreed to let Hayes be president in return for the Republicans promising to pull all federal troops from former Confederate states. That’s one of the main reasons why Reconstruction was abandoned in 1877.

3.Benjamin Harrison (1888)  

The 1888 race between incumbent Democratic President Grover Cleveland and Republican challenger Benjamin Harrison was riddled with corruption. Both parties accused the other of paying citizens to vote for their candidate. So-called “floaters” were voters with no party loyalty who could be sold to the highest bidder.  

In Indiana, a letter surfaced that allegedly showed Republicans plotting to buy up voters and to disrupt the opposition’s own bribery efforts. Meanwhile, Southern Democrats did everything in their power to suppress the Black vote, most of whom aligned with the Republicans, the “party of Lincoln.”  

When the nasty race was finally over, Cleveland and the Democrats took the entire South while Republican Harrison won the North and West, including Cleveland’s home state of Indiana by a slim margin. By sweeping the South, Cleveland won the popular vote by more than 90,000 votes, but he still lost the electoral vote 233 to 168.  

Four years later, Cleveland came back and beat Harrison, becoming the first and only U.S. president to serve two non-consecutive terms.

 4.George W. Bush (2000)    

For the next 112 years, election results were back to normal with the winner of the Electoral College also taking the popular vote. Then came the hotly contested presidential election of 2000 that made it all the way to the Supreme Court.

The candidates were Republican George W. Bush, son of the former president, and Democrat Al Gore, who served as vice president under President Bill Clinton. On election night, the results were too close to call in three states: Oregon, New Mexico and Florida. Gore ended up winning Oregon and New Mexico by the slimmest of margins (just 366 votes in New Mexico), which left Florida to decide the presidency.

   

8 0
3 years ago
Which psychological approach focused on the ability of people to choose activities that make them feel happy and bring them fulf
marshall27 [118]

Answer: Humanistic Psychology

Explanation:

Humanistic psychological approach focused on the ability of people to choose activities that make them feel happy and bring them fulfillment. The humanist is concerned with the fullest growth of the individual in the areas of love, fulfillment, self-worth, and autonomy. Humanistic psychology, proposed a hierarchy of needs or drives in order of decreasing priority or potency but increasing sophistication: physiological needs, safety, belongingness and love, esteem, and self-actualization.

8 0
3 years ago
Why does an individual need the company of other people?
Vesna [10]
Humans are social animals, so without the company of other humans they would eventually go mad or die.
6 0
3 years ago
Whats is persons right n responsibility when executing freedom of expression during verbal interpersonal conflict
vaieri [72.5K]
One right during a verbal conflict is to be able to keep and express one's own opinions - a person during a verbal conflict does not have to obligation to abandon their views.

One responsibility is to respect the other speaker and their views -they might not agree with them, but they should not disrespect their speaker.
7 0
4 years ago
The monetary autonomy argument is supported by the advocates of _____.
liubo4ka [24]
<span>The monetary autonomy argument is supported by the advocates of floating rates.
They believe that every country </span><span>should be allowed to choose its own inflation rate, which is what the monetary autonomy argument is all about. On the other hand, there are advocates of fixed exchange rates who argue that the opposite is true.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Eight-month-old atlas is able to climb the stairs when his mother helps him by encouraging him vocally and giving him little pus
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following groupings is likely to result in the slowest categorization time for an individual taking the Implicit As
    13·1 answer
  • Who were Eli Whitney, Francis Cabot Lowell, and Samuel Slater? · What was the cotton gin? How did it have a negative impact rath
    12·1 answer
  • What was the independent variable <br><br><br><br><br> Help me please
    7·1 answer
  • A tariff makes the total economy: a) worse off because it decreases both domestic consumer surplus and domestic producer surplus
    11·1 answer
  • How did Uncle tom's cabin effect the civil war?
    5·1 answer
  • Describe some of the environmental impacts of the Industrial Revolution
    5·1 answer
  • What type of government did China have for many thousands of years?
    14·1 answer
  • 1. Explain why it is important to prevent deforestation of the rain forest and what steps the Brazilian government has taken to
    9·1 answer
  • Choose a current issue that relates to the protection of individual rights. Write an argument that makes a claim related to whet
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!