The area on S1 associated with the thumb is as large as the area for the forearm. This is an example of cortical magnification.
Cortical magnification refers to the fact that the number of neurons in the visual cortex accountable for processing the visible stimulus of a given length varies as a function of the place of the stimulus within the visual field.
Cortical magnification happens when a disproportionately large place on the cortex is activated via stimulation of a small region on the receptor surface. One instance of cortical magnification is the pretty huge area of the visual cortex which is activated by means of stimulation of the fovea. Cortical magnification describes what number of neurons in a place of the visual cortex is 'responsible' for processing a stimulus of a given size, as a function of the visual field location.
The magnification element of the retina is the linear extent of the visual striate cortex to which each degree of the retina projects. It has been recommended that the magnification factor is directly proportional to visible acuity, but the magnification factor measured in monkeys was compared with visible acuity in guys.
Learn more about neurons here brainly.com/question/13439505
#SPJ4
The correct answer is A. Wanting to move because you found a great new school somewhere new.
Explanation:
In migration, a pull factor is one that attracts an individual to go to one place, for example, a job opportunity or better living conditions. This differs from a push factor because a push factor motivates a person to leave a place and move to a new one, for example, a war or lack of job opportunities.
In this context, the one that is an example of a pull factor is "Wanting to move because you found a great new school somewhere new" because a great school is a factor that pulls or attracts individuals to a new place. Also, other factors such as not enough resources, jobs, or no home make an individual leave a place or pushes him (push factors).
Answer:
The advantage is like the article stated "Over time, J. T. guided Sudhir into a world that few outsiders have ever known,". To put into lamen's terms Sudhir got a inside peek at what most researches look away or far back from a cage of violence, prositution and gangs. The disadvantage can be a ethical, moral case that Sudhir violated. For example, by getting involved in the action of what he was studying, he messed with the research by becoming a recipient in the study and now there's question the validity. He doesn't need to justify because he was a bystander and besides what's the best course of action when two criminal gangs decide to fight each with guns, call the police? When it had to due with beatings although I more of a moral grey area for me based on the fact that I'm just a bistander and there's no guns involved. I think the opposition's main argument is that Sudhir was reckless and he's moral compass is secrewed up
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
Slave traders: Thought that slaves werent really people and they could sell and do what ever they wanted with them
Abolitionists: They hated that people would be treated liked slaves and couldnt stand slavery. The knew it was wrong
The were alike because they both took part with slaves.They both took part
They are different because they have different views. One likes slavery one hates it
They helped put an end to it by helping slaves escape, ending it, saving slaves, teaching them how to read and write
Hope This Helps :)
The answer is<u> "an unrepresentative sample".</u>
Biased Sample, otherwise called the Unrepresentative Sample is viewed as a weak analogy.
This fallacy (a misstep, and a legitimate error is a slip-up in thinking) is framed when a man reaches a determination of a populace in light of a measure that is one-sided or biased.
The sample is biased or Unrepresentative somehow because of not having been picked arbitrarily from the population.
