The press could be involved in any of these, but I think C is the best choice. Why C? Because the phrase "yellow journalism" was coined during the <span>Spanish-American War. This phrase refers to facts that has been skewed or made up in order to further a goal. In this case, I think a ship was fired on or some explosion happened. One thing led to another and war broke out. After the dust settled, it turned out that the Spanish didn't fire first at all. So it was either an accident or something more criminal happened. </span>
Answer:
Lord Capulet tells Tybalt to not fight there at the party and to ignore Romeo because Lord Capulet wills Tybalt to do so
Of the four authors that have written books about Hurricane Katrina, the one that is most likely offering an objective account is B: a day-by-day account by a print journalist.
We might think that A is the correct answer because nobody could tell the experience like a person who lived in the place where the hurricane happened. Despite of this fact, he or she will tell his / her own experience and it might not be the experience of others. It will be a subjective account, truthful, but subjective.
On the other hand, a journalist who researched climate facts and consequences of the hurricane could give a more objective account. The journalist would show not one personal experience, but a lot of experiences from different families.
Black holes are most commonly found in black socks.
