Which of the following was NOT an effect of the war with Mexico?

History

1 answer:

Ganezh [65]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

yee be sure u got it right for a good job

Explanation:

brbbrbrbrbr has 5AM a little bit more to say about it and the floor was so confused bro and then you have a lot 55inches 5AM of a little bit more of a room is the same as the other hand in a hotel and I have to do it for ages to see

You might be interested in

Does the fact that the above army marched under the banner of a religion make any difference in the fate of the people on the lo

jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

The answer is "No"

Explanation:

With the end of the Cold War, researchers found religions development as a ground breaking political power in the contemporary world however it might have been there from the start.

Similarly as there isn't simple approach to characterize religion, so there is no relapse examination conceivable to state when religion is a significant reason alone, when it is a significant however auxiliary reason, and when it is a guise used to encourage war. History is, all things considered, not a science. Yet, religion, when used by a state, causes battle to appear to be good by legitimating it as in reason, declaring that murdering is morally supported, and giving comfort to the dispossessed.

3 0

3 years ago

“The necessities of our altered relationship to the Pacific Ocean [after the late 1840s] found expression in a comprehensive tre

Elodia [21]

Answer:

░░░░░▐▀█▀▌░░░░▀█▄░░░

░░░░░▐█▄█▌░░░░░░▀█▄░░

░░░░░░▀▄▀░░░▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░

░░░░▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░

░░░█▀▄▄▄█░▀▀░░

░░░▌░▄▄▄▐▌▀▀▀░░ This is Bob

▄░▐░░░▄▄░█░▀▀ ░░