1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zina [86]
3 years ago
8

What is President Grant trying to find in the barrel? If President Grant was busy with scandals, what is likely to happen to his

focus on Reconstruction efforts in the South?
History
1 answer:
Pavlova-9 [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

President grant was trying to save his face from the scandals that was uproaring about him thinking if he gets to the barrel his scandal will end. President grant was not corrupt but he was surrounded by corrupt individual and he was attempting to run away from his problems.

If he focus on the scandal he would not be able to focus on the reconstruction effort. This eventually affect his governance has he not trusted by his own people again.

You might be interested in
रोम वासियों ने विदेशी बरबर किसे कहा ?
irina [24]

Answer:

रोम वासी अकबर के पिता को विदेशी बाबर कहते थे

Explanation:

I hope help you

7 0
3 years ago
One significant long-term impact of the black death was
Mariana [72]

Answer:

One long term effect was the population decrease. Once populated villages and towns were left to rubble and ruins after the black death hit. Large, working expanses of land were left to deserted wilderness, crops were left to rot in the ground, and cattle were left to roam around until they perished.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
The veto power of the president under the U.S constitution best reflects the principle of ? Rule of law, natural rights, republi
Svetlanka [38]
Checks and balances is the answer

5 0
3 years ago
What is the differences between paleolithic and neolithic cultures?
denis-greek [22]
The Paleolithic Era <span>or </span>Old Stone Age<span> is a period of prehistory from about 2.6 million years ago to around 10000 years ago. The </span>Neolithic Era<span> or </span>New Stone Age<span> began around 10,000 </span>BC<span> and ended between 4500 and 2000 BC in various parts of the world. In the Paleolithic era, there were more than one human species but only one survived until the Neolithic era. Paleolithic humans lived a nomadic lifestyle in small groups. They used primitive stone tools and their survival depended heavily on their environment and </span>climate<span>. Neolithic humans discovered agriculture and animal husbandry, which allowed them to settle down in one area. The Mesolithic era followed the Paleolithic era but the period of the Paleolithic—Mesolithic boundary varies by </span>geography<span> by as much as several thousand years.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Russians feel about the Great War
    11·1 answer
  • The government institutes a new job-training program to prepare economically disadvantaged citizens for higher-paying, technolog
    5·1 answer
  • When did Ancient Egyptians start believing in Anubis, the god of embalming
    8·1 answer
  • Hurston’s years in Eatonville were _______________________. a. free of racial discrimination c. not influential in her future wr
    14·1 answer
  • Define national heringen and write some measures to preserve them​
    8·2 answers
  • What makes up the truman doctrine?
    8·1 answer
  • 20. The spinning wheel shown has evenly spaced spokes. What's the size of the angle between any two adjacent spokes?
    12·1 answer
  • A lion's roar can be heard five miles away
    14·1 answer
  • Road work ahead? Yeah _______?<br> 10 points!
    10·1 answer
  • Who was king after Charles I was beheaded?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!