Answer:
Hi you didn't post the passage
Explanation:
You can post it again
The correct answers is dialect because that is speech to another person so it would be dialect wich is a form of speech.
Answer:
It means that the kings would die for the tombe because it holds great value to them, I believe
Explanation:
Good luck!
The line "Tutankhamen is a drop of water in the ocean of history" contains a type of figurative language called metaphor, as is further explained below.
<h3>What is metaphor?</h3>
- Metaphor is a type of figurative language.
- It is used to compare different things, people, etc.
- Metaphor does NOT rely on the words "like" or "as" for the comparison.
- It states that "thing A is thing B" rather than "thing A is like thing B."
With the information above in mind, we can identify the use of metaphor in the line by Lewis. She states that Tutankhamen is a drop of water in the ocean of history, comparing the young pharaoh to a single drop of water.
Her purpose with such a comparison is to show that, in terms of all history, Tutankhamen's story is quite small, maybe even insignificant.
Learn more about metaphor here:
brainly.com/question/9418370
#SPJ1
The following sentence uses a straw man argument: "Those who are critical of self-driving cars need to learn to accept technological advances and stop resisting the future."
A straw man argument is when you give the impression that you are countering an opponent's point, when in reality you are "making up" a point that your opponent has not presented. It is like beating down a straw man or a dummy instead of a real adversary.
Here, people who are suspicious about self-driving cars are immediately described by the author as opposed to "technological advances" and "resisting the future." However, few people who have expressed doubts about self-driving cars would say that they are against scientific progress in general. Rather, they are concerned about the safety and the accuracy of the artifical intelligence, for example, but that does not mean that they are opposed to the idea. The author uses this rhetorical device to make his/her opponents lose credibility.
