Answer:
is this multiple choice theres no answers
Explanation:
(B) The scholars at Jundi Shapur were interested in various disciplines.
B is the best answer because it most accurately shows an inference from the passage. We know that the scholars were interested in various disciplines because it says, "The school created the very first teaching hospital in the world, a place where the sick were treated and young doctors learned their craft, as well as a fine observatory to track the heavens." This shows that the scholars studied everything from medicine to astrology. Option A is incorrect because the passage does not indicate that any of the academics had been persecuted. Option C is wrong because the passage says nothing of the scholars' genders. Option D is wrong because it does not include all of the cultures of the scholars that are talked about in the passage.
Yesterday she ran to the store and bought 5 flowers so today the answer is A
2 and 4 are both strong. It is clear what is going to be discussed especially on 4. Two is very intreging. It would be nice to see how that will develop. By that it would be interesting to see how those two ideas will be tired together.
One is too vague. It's true, but where are you going with that? Some indication has to be given.
Three has the same problem. Bad? What does bad mean? I may be wrong, but I think a thesis statement, if at all possible, should use concrete nouns. There should be no doubt about where this is going.
This is just an example of what I mean
Throughout history, every time a new technology was developed, it was immediately used in war. I think both 2 and 4 do something like that.
Answer
1 weak
2 strong
3 weak
4 strong
'Elervate' should be 'elevate'.
'Bloodstream' should be plural.
