All categories

4 years ago

Which best describes how unenumerated rights differ from procedural and substantive rights?

2 answers:

7 0

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Unenumerated rights are not listed in the Constitution." The answer that best describes how unenumerated rights differ from procedural and substantive rights is that Unenumerated rights are not listed in the Constitution

iren [92.7K]4 years ago

6 0

Unenumerated rights are not written in the Constitution.

Further Explanation:

Unenumerated rights are not written in the constitution. These rights are legal and illegal but not written in the Constitution. But the constitutional rights are those rights that are written in the Constitution. The procedural and substantive rights are dependent on the constitutional laws. Unenumerated rights are the legal rights that are implied from the existing laws. They are also called implied rights, fundamental rights, natural rights, and background rights. Unenumerated rights can become enumerated if it necessitates the systematization of the rights. Laws can become logically incoherent. For example, in the federal system, the constituent member has to interpret the Constitution and adhere that the authority is rightly federative. The term means natural rights which are inherent to mankind. In the USA ninth amendment protects the infringement of fundamental or unenumerated rights. The Supreme Court has the right to interpret the Constitution. It has interpreted the 14th amendment which protects the citizen from state infringement like the right to marital privacy. Some of the unenumerated rights are the right to travel, keeping the personal matters as private, care about health or body.

Learn More:

1. In a parliamentary system of representative democracy, the prime minister is appointed by the monarch. Is elected by representatives chosen by the people. Is the leader of the party that won the most seats in parliament? Is elected directly by the people.

brainly.com/question/477236

2. Which would most likely fall under the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court?

brainly.com/question/2203653

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Unenumerated Rights

Subject: Social Science

Keywords:

Implied rights, fundamental rights, logically incoherent, ninth amendment, interpreted, right to travel.

You might be interested in

Several years ago, Mark was arrested for participating in a crime. Since then, he has been confined to a mental hospital, even

Damm [24]

Answer:

NGRI- not guilty by reason of insanity

8 0

4 years ago

Following publicity of the scandal that ended his political career, New York governor Eliot Spitzer said, "I have begun to atone

tatyana61 [14]

Answer: Repentance

Explanation: Expressed publicly, this act of speech can be seen as an act of weakness or, conversely, as an act of strenght that exalts the image of the issuer, far from reducing it. It would then be a statement that contains three speech acts: the act of recognition of the fault, that of the proposal for reparation and the act of bravery that emerges from the public recongition of the lack of the politician´s regret is considered a discursive strategy of power that allows you to rehabilitate your image. In its strategic elaboration, the politician tries to appear sincere while mitigating or justifying the importance of the fault.

8 0

3 years ago

________ beliefs and values are passed from parents to children and reinforced by social institutions–schools, churches, busines

vivado [14]

The answer is Core.

Core beliefs are assumptions about ourselves, others, and the world. They are beliefs that are learned from our environment. We all have core beliefs and everyone's is different as they represent how and where have been raised and who or what we have been exposed to. Core beliefs are instilled in us and are very hard to change. They are assumptions we make about life and determine how we act as well as how happy or depressed we are.

6 0

3 years ago

Can someone answer this question please answer it correctly please help me if it’s correct I will mark you brainliest

Tema [17]

Answer:

Pretend that three people who weigh the same take turns on a seesaw. No matter which two people are on the seesaw at opposite ends, they are balanced. Our government is the same way. The three that take turns riding the seesaw are:

Congress - Legislative Branch

President - Executive Branch

Supreme Court - Judicial Branch

How do these branches balance and check each other? Each branch has different powers from another branch. But each weighs the same.

President:

Makes treaties with other nations

Carries out laws

Vetoes bills Congress passes if he thinks they are wrong

Appoints judges in the Judicial Branch for a life term

Writes the budget

Congress:

Makes laws

Can override a President's veto of a bill by 2/3 vote

Can impeach a President for misconduct

Must approve presidential appointments for judges and justices

Gives the O.K. on budget spending and treaties

Can remove judges from office for misconduct

Supreme Court:

Interprets laws

May decide that some laws that Congress makes or decisions that the President make are not right according to the Constitution.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When is it legal to operate a motorboat with someone sitting on the gunwale?

NARA [144]

The correct answer is when the boat is equipped with adequate side railings. Without the railings it is highly illegal, both to be there and on the starboard side. This is because it's dangerous and people can get hurt, or worse. If you have adequate railings then it is allowed.

4 0

4 years ago