This seems to be an opinion based question, I will provide you with both a yes and no response with arguments to support it and you can choose which one best suites your beliefs:
Yes, the benefits of raising the minimum wage outweigh the drawbacks. By raising the minimum wage you increase the quality of life for workers. Many full time workers are unable to afford housing or groceries in this economy on the minimum wage. At $7.25/hour and 40hrs/week is $290 before taxes. This is not enough income to cover the basic costs of living in most places. If people earned more money they would have more money to spend and corporations would profit from an increase in sales. Also, workers wouldn't have to depend so much on government services such as food stamps and section 8 housing assistance because they would be able to support their families with their own income. This would free up funds for government to provide more for the school systems, better healthcare and/or infrastructure.
No, the benefits of an increased minimum wage would not outweigh the drawbacks. The drawbacks of a higher minimum wage are significant because they most directly effect small business owners. The "mom and pop shop" owners depend on paying low salaries in order to keep their doors open. If they were forced to increase their pay rates, by what many minimum wage supporters suggest: more than double, they would not be able to afford employees to keep their doors open. Also, government agencies would be forced to pay their low-level workers as much as $15/hr which could become a tax burden on the citizens who pay for the salaries of all government employees. Raising the minimum wage would be detrimental to the economy because small companies and the government could not afford to support the salaries and benefits of their workers.
I believe the answer is: Spin doctor
Spin doctor refers to the person that responsible in creating a biased interpretation on the press in order to shine the current cabinet on a positive light. It is very common for people in this occupation to create controversy or false narrative in order to gain favorable opinion form the voters.
The Portuguese mostly settled in South America, however, Spain was ruling over most of South America and the Caribbeans.
Kalea was asked to identify whether a trait described her. according to the text, kalea would probably the trait with her self schema.
A trait is something about you that makes you "you." while your mother says which you get all your excellent trends from her, she means you've got the identical captivating smile and the equal excellent mind as she has. In science, trait refers to a function that is caused by genetics.
The time period self-schema refers back to the beliefs and thoughts human beings have about themselves in an effort to arrange information about the self. Self-schemas are generalizations approximately the self that are abstracted from beyond experiences and performing in a gift state of affairs.
A personality trait would then be something easily found, so words that describe persona developments may be “outgoing” or “sociable,” as an example. A character trait is something greater deep-seated and cultivated.
Learn more about self schema here:brainly.com/question/27507174
#SPJ4
Answer:
"Behavioral component" of an attitude describes an intention to behave a certain way toward someone or something.
Explanation:
The technique the boldness we have effects how we act or behave. For example: “I will avoid spiders and yell if I see one”. Cognitive component: this includes a person's confidence / information about an insolence thing. For example: “I believe spiders are dangerous”. Behavior component of an attitude involves of a person's propensities to act ‘in a specific way near an thing. It denotes to that portion of attitude which imitates the purpose of a individual in the short-run or long run.
