Answer:
2 12/15 and 2 10/15
Step-by-step explanation:
4 x 3 = 12
2 x 5 = 10
1: 9x+3
2: 3m^2+9m-7
3: 3x^2+3y^2+y+4
Those are all of the answers in order! I hope this helps.
Answer:
hello the table related to this question is missing attached below is the missing table
answer : An exponential function is much better fit because there is no fixed rate in the table
Step-by-step explanation:
An exponential function is much better fit because there is no fixed rate in the table attached but the values in the table keeps increasing exponentially, hence an Exponential function will be a better fit, But a linear function would be preferred only if there is a fixed rate
Answer:
The correct option is;
comparing plant survivorship in areas where hikers stay on the trail with plants where hikers leave the trail
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis that the area formerly covered by known plants which is now bare soil due to trampling in the alpine areas by hikers can be tested by means of comparing the areas where during the cause of their visit, the hikers remain on the trail as they move within the park to other portion of the park where it is known that there are either very few or no hiker remain on the trail. The outcome will determine if the cause of the appearance of bare soil is due to the transit and trampling by hikers.
Answer:
3 weeks: 21.5 inches
w weeks: 20+0.5w inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Equation: 20+0.5w.
20 was when it was first planted and 0.5 is the amount it grows per week.
