1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OlgaM077 [116]
3 years ago
7

Compared to amending the U.S. Constitution, the process for amending the Texas Constitution is

History
2 answers:
goldenfox [79]3 years ago
8 0
Your answer is gonna be C
Harrizon [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

much easier

Explanation:

In contrast, the Texas Constitution is relatively easy to amend. While it is somewhat difficult to get a constitutional amendment proposed (it requires a two-thirds majority in both houses of the legislature).

Hope this helps...Mark as Brainliest!!

You might be interested in
What statements are true about the pullman strike
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

The Pullman Company lost more money fighting the strike than it would have paid out by giving in to workers.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
During the early 1900s, Booker T. Washington supported a moderate strategy for attaining civil rights for African Americans, whi
Licemer1 [7]

Answer: Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X

Explanation: Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Christian minister, scholar and activist who became the most visible spokesperson and leader in the Civil Rights Movement from 1955 until his assassination in 1968. His "I have a dream speech" is popular all around the world. He believed in a moderate non-violent approach for achieving equality.

Malcolm X was an American Muslim minister and human rights activist who was also very popular during the civil rights movement. He is best known for his staunch and controversial black racial advocacy and his belief that the movement's aim be achieved by any means necessary.

Luther King advocated non-violent direct action and passive resistance while Malcolm X urged his fellow black Americans to protect themselves against white aggression by any means necessary, even violence. This basic difference in their strategies often made them at odds with each other.

8 0
3 years ago
Unlike the gradual strengthening of the powers of Parliament in England, France's change from absolute monarchy was
blsea [12.9K]

D. a result of European turmoil caused by the defeat of the Spanish Armada

6 0
3 years ago
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain una
UNO [17]

Answer:  natural rights

Explanation:

A strong overall theme of the Declaration of Independence is that people are born with natural rights.  Perhaps the most memorable phrase from the Declaration is the one you quoted, which uses the term "unalienable rights" as an equivalent for natural rights.  Because  the rights belong to us by nature, we cannot be separated or alienated from those rights.

Thomas Jefferson (writer of the Declaration of Independence) and other American founding fathers got their ideas about natural rights from philosophers of the Enlightenment, such as John Locke (1632-1704).  Locke strongly argued that all human beings have certain natural rights which are to be protected and preserved.    Locke's ideal was one that promoted individual freedom and equal rights and opportunity for all.  Each individual's well-being (life, health, liberty, possessions) should be served by the way government and society are arranged.   The American founding fathers accepted the views of Locke and other Enlightenment thinkers and acted on them.

John Locke, in his<em> Second Treatise on Civil Government</em> (1690), expressed these ideas as follows.  Notice similarities to what is said in the Declaration of Independence (1776) ...

  • <em>The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions… (and) when his own preservation comes not in competition, ought he, as much as he can, to preserve the rest of mankind, and may not, unless it be to do justice on an offender, take away, or impair the life, or what tends to the preservation of the life, the liberty, health, limb, or goods of another.</em>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What economic motivations led European to seize control in West Africa? Describe which European nations gained control in West A
Pani-rosa [81]

Answer:

industrialization interested the Europeans- they saw Africa as a place to get resources for their own industrial ambitions, where nations could compete for new markets for their goods, and where they could get many raw materials. Consequently, the Europeans seized areas of Africa.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is an example of a fixed expense?
    9·1 answer
  • What role did railroads play in the Industrial Revolution?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the soviet leaders want Britain and united states to invade france
    15·1 answer
  • The two stages of photosynthesis take the energy found in light and store it in the ___________. chemical bonds found in sugar m
    15·2 answers
  • Who discovered King Tuts tomb?
    9·1 answer
  • Which steps did Martin Luther King Jr. outline for a nonviolent campaign in his "Letter from Birmingham Jail"?
    9·1 answer
  • Determine if the statement below refers to the Basic Rights of Man, Wrongs by the King, or Independence Declared.
    9·1 answer
  • “ i played sports in the village court “ which speaker did this most likely belong too?
    9·1 answer
  • Which planet has the highest surface gravity of terrestrial planets?
    12·2 answers
  • Identify and explain how this quote represents Enlightenment ideals
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!