1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
statuscvo [17]
4 years ago
10

Which of the following is an INCORRECT statement regarding silence as​ misrepresentation?

Law
1 answer:
antoniya [11.8K]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

c. Generally, each party to a contract owes a duty to disclose all the facts to the other party.

Explanation:

in law,silence does not lead to any legal liability.contractual relationship between 2 or more parties,  there is  generally no duty to disclose anything to the other side as just keeping silence does not constitute misrepresentation

You might be interested in
The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are three key documents that built a foundation for gov
kari74 [83]
The answer would be true
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is the antitrust law still in affect? There seem to be alot of manufacturers that only have one distributor. Why is that?
DanielleElmas [232]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

because of uncontrolled of political law

3 0
4 years ago
QUESTION 4
Naya [18.7K]

Answer:

b. they are more engaged with politics

6 0
3 years ago
Substantively, is there a difference between an agency rule and a legal statute?
drek231 [11]

With regulations, an agency holds a public hearing and after that hearing makes a decision on either adopting, changing, or rejecting the regulation. Laws are also rules that govern everyone equally, while regulations only affect those who deal directly with the agency that is enforcing them.

5 0
3 years ago
Abel was employed as a security guard for Seep Corporation. Abel's job was to guard a fenced-in area and to use force to keep in
Alex Ar [27]

Answer:

B. Seep's is not liable because Abel didn't act within the scope of his employment.

Explanation:

According to the facts, Abel is a rightful employee of Seep Corporation. And he also has a duty to preserve the interest of his employer.

But at the same time, his act of beating up and assaulting Johnny was done outside of the jurisdiction of his working hours. And as such, he wasn't covered in the company's rule of using <em>"force to keep intruders from climbing the fence to enter the plant"</em>. Moreover, the personal attack that Johnny had done on him makes this assault personal. So, Abel's attack on Johnny has nothing to do with the company he works for, and the Corporation is not liable for any charges or damages that their employee had done outside of his 'employment' hours.

Thus, the <u>correct answer is option B. </u>

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can I get help with this question thank you.
    11·1 answer
  • Is there any females out there that will talk to me? 15-18
    15·2 answers
  • Puzzle: Murder case
    8·2 answers
  • Only the Florida Highway Patrol has jurisdiction to patrol the roadways of our
    15·1 answer
  • true or false an eyewitness who is 100% certain in there identification in court is almost always accurate
    5·2 answers
  • Police are allowed to use a ______ ______<br> of force than the suspect?
    9·1 answer
  • Strict liability is where fault has to be proven in a case.<br> True or false?
    5·1 answer
  • How did george mason feel about a powerful federal government?
    13·1 answer
  • If your mp3 player is stolen from your apartment, what type of insurance would it be covered under?.
    6·1 answer
  • 12 . if it has been previously suspended and reinstated, your license will be suspended for accumulating ____ points within a th
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!