Answer:
The inference that is best supported by the passage is: A. Prior to the "Click it or Ticket" law, motorist could not be stopped simply for not waring a seatbelt."
Explanation:
In the passage is very clear that in the new law motorist can be now pulled over and ticketed for not wearing seatbelts (later in the passage it implies that's the reason why lawyers and citizens' gorups are protesting), which implies that before the state legislature passed the law this was not a reason to be pulled over even though this is not stated in the passage, the entire text circles around the novelty of pulling over motorist for not wearing seatbelt, therefore the best option is A especially because that is the main idea of the text.
A. Think about the good feelings he has had
They share the Jordan River<span> ;3 Hope this helped</span>
Answer:
B. . Prices of goods were subject to fluctuate widely
Explanation:
Due to the reliance, countries in Latin America require the supply of raw materials from another country in order to fulfill a large portion of their economic production.
This means that if the price of the materials changes in another country, it will most likely force the producers in Latin American country to adjust their production expense in order to accommodate the new price.
As a result, The Prices of finished goods in Latin America often fluctuates.
