Answer:
The correct answer is A. The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
Explanation:
The idea in this question is to identify the most vulnerable argument, for which it is possible to conclude that The first argument is only base in the opinion of the theorists and critics and there is no clear evidence or facts to prove the statement. It only states because of someone's opinion “no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist” simply the argument is false. This results as a fallacy since it is an argument without evidence to show that it is valid.
Answer:
J was driving her own car from the Post Office after retrieving her employer's mail
Explanation:
A personal auto policy provides insurance coverage for the injury or damage to others, which is in liability insurance form. It also provides coverage for injuries to the insured.
A personal auto policy is mainly designed to cover the damages for the family's or individual's personal use of auto.
In the context, policyholder J will be covered under the personal auto policy in the scenario where J after receiving mail from her employer was coming back in her private car from post office. This is because the business use of any private passenger cars is NOT excluded under Medical Payments Coverage.
Answer:
Cause of the war was King John 's refusal to act according to what he had agreed upon by signing the Magna Carta. Some may say Magna Carta was not voluntarily agreed upon by John and some clauses were outright unrealistic; that John had the barons up to the ears, and simply signed to get them off his back.
Explanation:
