In the very, very simplest terms, judging the validity of an argument starts centers around this process:
1) Identify the rhetoric (Lines of Argument) from the actual, formal reasons. Separate the persuasive language from the actual claims to truth and fact.
2) Analyze those reasons (claims to truth and fact) by identifying their logic (often in the Implicit Reasons) and evidence.
3) Test and evaluate the logic and evidence; identify logical errors and ask whether the evidence can and has been tested and objectively, repeatedly, factually verified.
To explore the world and get a broder view of the world.Hope this helps!!1
1. It is Beneatha's external conflict.
2. It is Mama's internal conflict.
3. It is Walter's external conflict.
4. It is Ruth's internal conflict.
It is so because, 1) Beneatha was struggling with her real identity.
2) As Mama was the beneficiary of her husband's insurance money, to which she thoughted to spend to buy a house as it was her and Mr. Younger's dream. But Walter was resisting for that money as well.
3) Walter wanted to become a quick rich and to become a self sufficient business owner, through which he will be able to fulfill all his dreams.
4) Ruth's internal conflict was whether to terminate her pregnancy, which later on turned into external conflict as her mother-in-law opposes her this decision.
To learn more about Beneatha here
brainly.com/question/19545032
#SPJ4
Answer:
C to determine when the squirrel will see him as a threat
Explanation:
Bill Bateman conducted an experiment on squirrels when he visited his family in New York to determine when the squirrels would see him as a threat or not.
He walked in four different ways towards the squirrels by:
- Walking on the sidewalk, with direct eye contact with the squirrels
- Walking on the sidewalk, but not looking at the squirrel intently
- Leaving the sidewalk with no direct eye contact with the squirrels.
- Leaving the sidewalk and looking intently at it.