Answer:
Resource View
Explanation:
A resource view or resource-based view is a strategic tool, hence its use by managers. It is bascially employed by management for the assessment of an organisation's strategic resources or assets in order to enhance the efficient and effective use of all available resources to maximize competitive advantage.
Some refer to the Resource Based View (RBV) as a managerial framework specifically employed to strategically maximize resource use for sustained advantage over competitors.
The two major causes of postoperative wound evisceration are as follows,
- Post-surgery wound stress, which might involve something as simple as a cough or sneeze
- Certain sutures may disintegrate too quickly, causing the wound to open.
- The type of closure employed, may or may not have been beneficial for the incision.
What is evisceration?
Evisceration is a rare but serious surgical complication in which the surgical incision opens and the abdominal organs protrude or come out. Evisceration is a medical emergency that must be treated as such.
- It can range from mild to severe, with the organs exposed and slightly protruding outside of the incision.
- Intestines, for example, may leak from an abdominal incision.
- This is usually considered a medical emergency.
- If you notice tissue or organs emerging from a surgical site, call your doctor.
- It is critical to keep the wound wet. Cover the opening and organs with a wet, sterile bandage or sheet while on your route to seek medical help or while waiting for EMS.
Learn more about Evisceration here,
brainly.com/question/4224130
# SPJ4
Answer:
Frictional unemployment.
Explanation:
The type of unemployment which results from GE's decision is frictional unemployment. Frictional unemployment is when people are unemployed because they are moving from one job to another. In this case because the rest of the industry does not reduce it's employees the employees fired from GE are now in the process of finding others jobs in the industry.
Answer:
PV = $155,343
Explanation:
This question requires application of PV of annuity, according to which:
PV = p [1-(1+r)^-n/r]
P= Periodic Payment
r = rate of period
n = number of periods
r = 3%/12 = 0.25% (monthly), n = 120, P = $1500
PV = 1500 * [\frac{1 - (1 + 0.0025)^{-120}}{0.0025}]
PV = 1500 * 103.5618
PV = $155,343
Answer:
both Sue and Tessa gain 0.3; 0.50
Explanation:
Sue's production possibilities frontier:
Sue's opportunity cost:
- opportunity cost of producing caps = 21 / 70 = 0.3 jackets
- opportunity cost of producing jackets = 70/21 = 3.33 caps
Tessa's production possibilities frontier:
Tessa's opportunity cost:
- opportunity cost of producing caps = 25 / 50 = 0.5 jackets
- opportunity cost of producing jackets = 50/25 = 2 caps
Sue should produce caps and Tessa jackets:
total production = 70 caps (Sue) + 25 jackets (Tessa), if they trade they will both win because each specialized in producing the good in which they have a comparative advantage (lower opportunity costs). If Sue traded and received 21 jackets, she would still have 28 caps left. If Tessa traded and received 50 caps, she would still have 10 jackets left.
