Answer:
The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence</em></u>
Explanation:
History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.
For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.
However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.
Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.
While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.
The kinetic energy of one kilogram is 0, because there is 0 movement. Hope this helps:)
How did Chapter,Proprietary,Royal types of Colonies different?
- Charter- Governor and Legislature Elected by Colonists
- Proprietary- Proprietor selected the governor and upper house, Colonists Elected the Lower House.
- Royal- Directly Ruled by Britain.
Anti-federalists intended to have bill of rights included in the constitution.
Explanation:
Federalists desired to have a strong federal government while anti federalists intended that the states be conferred with unlimited powers. Anti-federalists had their own apprehensions and feared that constitution may have any despotic element as an impact of British colonial imperialism that existed prior to declaration of Independence.
So anti federalists stated that they need to incorporate bill of rights in the constitution. Initially federalists protested saying that it is impossible to state every right and some unstated right may be abused and broken.
I’m not really sure about this question
