The main result of the war was two centuries of peace between the United States and Britain. All the causes of the war had disappeared with the end of the war between Britain and France and with the destruction of the power of Indians to block American expansion into the Northwest. (I’m not sure if that is correct hope it helps)
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Disappointed by this apparent out of line treatment, ranchers swung to gatherings, for example, the Populist Party to endeavor to address their. Agriculturists had issues with the railways in the late 1800s. The agriculturists trusted they weren't being dealt with decently or similarly by the railroad organizations.
The issues confronting the agriculturist of the late nineteenth Century were wide. They extended from falling harvest costs, to uncalled for treatment by the railways, and furthermore the battle to have silver instituted as cash, in exertion to expand the estimation of a dollar.
Agriculturists trusted that loan fees were too high on account of monopolistic moneylenders, and the cash supply was deficient, delivering emptying. A falling cost dimension expanded the genuine weight of obligation, as ranchers reimbursed advances with dollars worth essentially more than those they had acquired.
Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
The answer is A because of the fact of the federalist supported the acts democratic republicans opposed it!!!!!!!!!
