1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
3 years ago
13

What is the iran-contra scandal

History
2 answers:
dsp733 years ago
6 0
The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration.
MrMuchimi3 years ago
3 0

The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.


The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]


The plan was later complicated in late 1985, when Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council diverted a portion of the proceeds from the Iranian weapon sales to fund the Contras, a group of anti-Sandinista rebel fighters, in their struggle against the socialist government of Nicaragua.[4] While President Ronald Reagan was a vocal supporter of the Contra cause,[7] the evidence is disputed as to whether he personally authorized the diversion of funds to the Contras.[4][5][8] Handwritten notes taken by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger on 7 December 1985 indicate that Reagan was aware of potential hostage transfers with Iran, as well as the sale of Hawk and TOW missiles to "moderate elements" within that country.[9] Weinberger wrote that Reagan said "he could answer to charges of illegality but couldn't answer to the charge that 'big strong President Reagan passed up a chance to free the hostages.'"[9] After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages.[10] The investigation was impeded when large volumes of documents relating to the affair were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.[11] On 4 March 1987, Reagan made a further nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for the affair and stating that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages".[12]


The affair was investigated by the U.S. Congress and by the three-person, Reagan-appointed Tower Commission. Neither investigation found evidence that President Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs.[4][5][8] In the end, fourteen administration officials were indicted, including then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Eleven convictions resulted, some of which were vacated on appeal.[13] The rest of those indicted or convicted were all pardoned in the final days of the presidency of George H. W. Bush, who had been Vice President at the time of the affair.[14] The Iran–Contra affair and the ensuing deception to protect senior administration officials (including President Reagan) has been cast as an example of post-truth politics.[15]

You might be interested in
Which of the following can increase your credit card’s APR?
kondor19780726 [428]
<span>APR or the annual percentage rate is the yearly rate charged for acquiring or earned through a speculation, and is communicated as a rate that speaks to the real yearly cost of assets over the term of an advance. Missing a credit card payment can increase your credit card's APR. </span>
8 0
4 years ago
Help please! What is a land bridge???
Vinvika [58]

a connection between two landmasses, especially a prehistoric one that allowed humans and animals to colonize new territory before being cut off by the sea.

3 0
3 years ago
Why was the colony of Jamestown founded (started) by the English (PLZ HELP)
tangare [24]

Answer:

The Virginia Company of England made a daring proposition: sail to the new, mysterious land, which they called Virginia in honor of Elizabeth I, the Virgin Queen, and begin a settlement. They established Jamestown, Virginia, on May 14, 1607, the first permanent British settlement in North America.

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Spanish Explorer
Alex787 [66]

Based on the information given, it should be noted that the explorer that's  described is B. Cabeza de Vaca.

Cabeza de Vaca was a Spanish explorer of the new World. He was also one of the four survivors of the 1527 Narvaez expedition.

He was a trader and faith healer to several Native American tribes before he reconnected with Spanish civilization in Mexico. He wrote the account and commentaries detailing his experiences.

Learn more about explorers on:

brainly.com/question/2522222

8 0
2 years ago
Who were the major American intellectuals and political theorist argued for the scraping the articles of Confederation
Bond [772]
The correct answer is the "nationalists." The major American intellectuals and political theorists who argued for scrapping the Articles of Confederation and coming up with an alternative <span>binding contract- the American Constitution are the nationalists.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where can I find a picture of Walter Sammons, the inventor of the hot comb?
    13·1 answer
  • Which amendment has been interpreted as the foundation of implied rights?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is true regarding the construction of the transcontinental railway? A. Construction began in O
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the Ming Dynasty institute a policy of isolationism
    7·1 answer
  • How were shah abbas and suleyman the magnificent similar ​
    5·1 answer
  • Which country became the dominant power on the
    14·1 answer
  • Which best describes Dorothea Dix’s efforts on behalf of people with disabilities?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the invention of the steam engine contribute to economic growth? Plz help me
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following goods originally came from europe?
    7·2 answers
  • Explain how Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Dred Scott and Kansas-Nebraska Act affected people’s view on slavery.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!