1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
3 years ago
13

What is the iran-contra scandal

History
2 answers:
dsp733 years ago
6 0
The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration.
MrMuchimi3 years ago
3 0

The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.


The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]


The plan was later complicated in late 1985, when Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council diverted a portion of the proceeds from the Iranian weapon sales to fund the Contras, a group of anti-Sandinista rebel fighters, in their struggle against the socialist government of Nicaragua.[4] While President Ronald Reagan was a vocal supporter of the Contra cause,[7] the evidence is disputed as to whether he personally authorized the diversion of funds to the Contras.[4][5][8] Handwritten notes taken by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger on 7 December 1985 indicate that Reagan was aware of potential hostage transfers with Iran, as well as the sale of Hawk and TOW missiles to "moderate elements" within that country.[9] Weinberger wrote that Reagan said "he could answer to charges of illegality but couldn't answer to the charge that 'big strong President Reagan passed up a chance to free the hostages.'"[9] After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages.[10] The investigation was impeded when large volumes of documents relating to the affair were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.[11] On 4 March 1987, Reagan made a further nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for the affair and stating that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages".[12]


The affair was investigated by the U.S. Congress and by the three-person, Reagan-appointed Tower Commission. Neither investigation found evidence that President Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs.[4][5][8] In the end, fourteen administration officials were indicted, including then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Eleven convictions resulted, some of which were vacated on appeal.[13] The rest of those indicted or convicted were all pardoned in the final days of the presidency of George H. W. Bush, who had been Vice President at the time of the affair.[14] The Iran–Contra affair and the ensuing deception to protect senior administration officials (including President Reagan) has been cast as an example of post-truth politics.[15]

You might be interested in
I'm only a child and I don't have all the solutions, but I want you to realise, neither do you!
Luden [163]

I THINK THE ANSWER IS C

3 0
3 years ago
Discuss how the culture of Rome reflected life and values in the Roman Empire
faltersainse [42]
As the Roman Empire expands it influences the civilizations that it ruled over. Romans tend to Romanize the people with the roman culture and the way of living and making a roman citizen the dream of every people inside its domain. Also the way the roman culture is propagate is through games and festivals adding more attraction to the other culture to affiliate themselves with the roman culture. Also the roman system becomes the foundation of a lot of empires and kingdoms even after the fall of the Roman Empire.
5 0
3 years ago
What was the Louisiana purchase and why was it important to our countries history and growth?
never [62]
The Louisiana Purchase was a land deal between the U.S. and France. The U.S. bought over 800,000 square miles along the Mississippi river(West) for $15 million dollars. This was so important because it expanded the U.S. almost half their size.

5 0
3 years ago
Choose the option below that best summarizes how the Protestant and Catholic
makkiz [27]

Answer:

theanswer is B

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The historian Procopius attributes this speech to Theodora. She supposedly said it to Justinian when he wanted to flee from the
postnew [5]
The correct answer should be
<span>It is shameful for an emperor to flee the rioters.

Basically, she tells him that it is better to die as royalty and be buried as such than to flee and die like a commoner somewhere else where you are not respected. It would be easier to flee, but better and more honorable if they stayed and died.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which problems led to the decline of sumer? Select all correct answers
    6·1 answer
  • What happens if no presidential candidate wins a majority of electoral votes answers?
    10·2 answers
  • 19. What was the topic of the book The Other America?
    5·2 answers
  • Leading up to the civil war, many enslaved african americans made the decision to escape their captors and flee to the north in
    9·1 answer
  • The map shows the Roman Empire around the year 284.
    15·2 answers
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!! Which philosopher expressed the idea that representative government would be best for society in his boo
    5·2 answers
  • How did Aryan religion contribute to class differences in India?
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the use of satire in this passage
    8·1 answer
  • Which political party (Federalist or Democratic-Republican) would be most likely to support the following policies and/or people
    5·1 answer
  • Look at the chart: Why do you think the war began in 18397
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!