1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
2 years ago
13

What is the iran-contra scandal

History
2 answers:
dsp732 years ago
6 0
The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration.
MrMuchimi2 years ago
3 0

The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.


The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]


The plan was later complicated in late 1985, when Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council diverted a portion of the proceeds from the Iranian weapon sales to fund the Contras, a group of anti-Sandinista rebel fighters, in their struggle against the socialist government of Nicaragua.[4] While President Ronald Reagan was a vocal supporter of the Contra cause,[7] the evidence is disputed as to whether he personally authorized the diversion of funds to the Contras.[4][5][8] Handwritten notes taken by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger on 7 December 1985 indicate that Reagan was aware of potential hostage transfers with Iran, as well as the sale of Hawk and TOW missiles to "moderate elements" within that country.[9] Weinberger wrote that Reagan said "he could answer to charges of illegality but couldn't answer to the charge that 'big strong President Reagan passed up a chance to free the hostages.'"[9] After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages.[10] The investigation was impeded when large volumes of documents relating to the affair were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.[11] On 4 March 1987, Reagan made a further nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for the affair and stating that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages".[12]


The affair was investigated by the U.S. Congress and by the three-person, Reagan-appointed Tower Commission. Neither investigation found evidence that President Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs.[4][5][8] In the end, fourteen administration officials were indicted, including then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Eleven convictions resulted, some of which were vacated on appeal.[13] The rest of those indicted or convicted were all pardoned in the final days of the presidency of George H. W. Bush, who had been Vice President at the time of the affair.[14] The Iran–Contra affair and the ensuing deception to protect senior administration officials (including President Reagan) has been cast as an example of post-truth politics.[15]

You might be interested in
Why did many colonists protest the Stamp Act?
Veronika [31]
The Stamp Act of 1765 was levied mainly at the American Colonists in order for the British to make money off of them. The colonists did not want the stamp act, and stated that it was unconstitutionanal, and became extremely violent. Parliament repealed the Stamp Act in 1766, but passed another one in a different name that includes what the Stamp Act had in it.

hope this helps

The colonists became extremely violent* is key
4 0
3 years ago
What document gave only Parliament the power to tax
astraxan [27]
Magna carta is the document that gaveonly parliament power to tax
7 0
3 years ago
Why might the united states have been interested in supporting the new latin american nations in the early 1800s?
Luden [163]

Answer:

To establish a beneficial trade with Latin America and to keep it's country safe.

Explanation:

The United States wanted to establish beneficial trade with Latin America. They wanted Europe to stay out of the affairs of the American continents. The United States promote democracy to create a world free of revolution and war because they wanted to keep their country safe. They needed to keep European countries from creating new republics there. This was the only way that they could stay safe and keep their people safe. They had no option not to get involved.

8 0
2 years ago
Yes/No, celebrities and athletes of color have/do not have a responsibility to their community/society
anygoal [31]
Yes they do have responsibilities to their comminuty/society
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What reason did cornwallis give for staying at yorktown and trying to defend his position there
rusak2 [61]
A sudden tropical storm disrupted an effort to move his army northward across the York River to Gloucester Poin.
Hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • An industrial nations expansion by colonizing smaller countries for their natural resources is called colonization
    6·1 answer
  • What is an example of a religious influence of Judaism ?
    10·2 answers
  • Which idea from this paragraph is repeated too often and needs to be deleted?
    8·1 answer
  • Did African societies trade enslaved people?
    5·1 answer
  • How did the great depression impact europe between world war 1 and world.war 2?
    13·1 answer
  • Once Siddhartha Gautama resolved to end human suffering, he had a dream that night that helped him reach enlightenment the follo
    8·2 answers
  • Where did Monitor vs. Virginia battle take place
    13·1 answer
  • The bicameral (having two chambers) Legislative Branch is a form of checks and balances within that Branch.
    14·2 answers
  • What is a supply curve<br>​
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!