1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
3 years ago
13

What is the iran-contra scandal

History
2 answers:
dsp733 years ago
6 0
The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration.
MrMuchimi3 years ago
3 0

The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.


The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]


The plan was later complicated in late 1985, when Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council diverted a portion of the proceeds from the Iranian weapon sales to fund the Contras, a group of anti-Sandinista rebel fighters, in their struggle against the socialist government of Nicaragua.[4] While President Ronald Reagan was a vocal supporter of the Contra cause,[7] the evidence is disputed as to whether he personally authorized the diversion of funds to the Contras.[4][5][8] Handwritten notes taken by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger on 7 December 1985 indicate that Reagan was aware of potential hostage transfers with Iran, as well as the sale of Hawk and TOW missiles to "moderate elements" within that country.[9] Weinberger wrote that Reagan said "he could answer to charges of illegality but couldn't answer to the charge that 'big strong President Reagan passed up a chance to free the hostages.'"[9] After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages.[10] The investigation was impeded when large volumes of documents relating to the affair were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.[11] On 4 March 1987, Reagan made a further nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for the affair and stating that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages".[12]


The affair was investigated by the U.S. Congress and by the three-person, Reagan-appointed Tower Commission. Neither investigation found evidence that President Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs.[4][5][8] In the end, fourteen administration officials were indicted, including then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Eleven convictions resulted, some of which were vacated on appeal.[13] The rest of those indicted or convicted were all pardoned in the final days of the presidency of George H. W. Bush, who had been Vice President at the time of the affair.[14] The Iran–Contra affair and the ensuing deception to protect senior administration officials (including President Reagan) has been cast as an example of post-truth politics.[15]

You might be interested in
4. Because American Indian tribes spoke a single language, communication between tribes was fairly
Shalnov [3]

Answer: False

Explanation:

Native Americans were and are still a diverse group of people who had different cultures and ways of life. They spoke different languages and had conflict between themselves like Europeans did amongst themselves as well.

The lack of a single language and the competition between tribes severely hampered their response to the increasing power of the Europeans. There were even instances where a tribe would ally with the Europeans to defeat another tribe.

7 0
3 years ago
r a bill has been passed by both houses of Congress it A) becomes a law. B) is sent to the President. C) returns to the house of
Brut [27]

Answer:

The answer is A

Hope this helps :)

Sry if wrong

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the "healing act" that MOST likely inspired "The Blue and the Gray"?​
Alla [95]

Answer:  it was the act of compassion and reconciliation by the ladies of Columbus, Mississippi, that received extensive national praise and inspired the poem "The Blue and the Gray." Their deed of compassion was covered as an act of national reconciliation by newspapers across the country.

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
What did Aquinas believe?
Olenka [21]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

What did Aquinas believe?

Answer: In simple terms, Thomas Aquinas believed that science and faith could coexist.

St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) was an Italian priest of the Dominican religious congression that founding the influential Thomistic school that developed theological concepts in the Middle Ages such as the idea that God could be demonstrated by observing the cause and effect of things, by observing the movement of the world, and God granted intelligent to al natural beings.

Written between 1265 and 1274, "Summa Theologica" has been one of the most important books for the Catholic Church that still today is part of the curriculum of religious studies for priests. In Summa Theologica, St. Thomas Aquinas sought to reconcile faith and reason.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following situations is the best example of a short term movement?
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

Answer is A

Explanation:

All option except A is a short term movement because going to a store only takes us a few moments and other 3 options are the example of long term movements

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did agriculture differ in the three colonial regions?
    10·2 answers
  • What is a large farming estate<br><br> pls help on time limit :3
    6·2 answers
  • What happened in Santa Fe on August 18, 1846?
    7·1 answer
  • which dynasty did not use the civil service exam and instead gave key government jobs to friends and family members?
    12·2 answers
  • Which groups in French society were most supportive of the Second French Empire at first? Why?
    9·1 answer
  • Complete the following paragraph about one of the Persian Wars.
    11·2 answers
  • Why were people able to spend money on<br> entertainment?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did a lot of violence happen between the workers in the union? - On Gilded Age​
    7·1 answer
  • Why did President Roosevelt consider December 7, 1941, a "date which will live in infamy"?
    11·1 answer
  • how did the knights of labor increase their membership from 100,000 to 700,000 in the early 1880s? quizlet
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!