1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
3 years ago
13

What is the iran-contra scandal

History
2 answers:
dsp733 years ago
6 0
The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration.
MrMuchimi3 years ago
3 0

The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.


The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]


The plan was later complicated in late 1985, when Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council diverted a portion of the proceeds from the Iranian weapon sales to fund the Contras, a group of anti-Sandinista rebel fighters, in their struggle against the socialist government of Nicaragua.[4] While President Ronald Reagan was a vocal supporter of the Contra cause,[7] the evidence is disputed as to whether he personally authorized the diversion of funds to the Contras.[4][5][8] Handwritten notes taken by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger on 7 December 1985 indicate that Reagan was aware of potential hostage transfers with Iran, as well as the sale of Hawk and TOW missiles to "moderate elements" within that country.[9] Weinberger wrote that Reagan said "he could answer to charges of illegality but couldn't answer to the charge that 'big strong President Reagan passed up a chance to free the hostages.'"[9] After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages.[10] The investigation was impeded when large volumes of documents relating to the affair were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.[11] On 4 March 1987, Reagan made a further nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for the affair and stating that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages".[12]


The affair was investigated by the U.S. Congress and by the three-person, Reagan-appointed Tower Commission. Neither investigation found evidence that President Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs.[4][5][8] In the end, fourteen administration officials were indicted, including then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Eleven convictions resulted, some of which were vacated on appeal.[13] The rest of those indicted or convicted were all pardoned in the final days of the presidency of George H. W. Bush, who had been Vice President at the time of the affair.[14] The Iran–Contra affair and the ensuing deception to protect senior administration officials (including President Reagan) has been cast as an example of post-truth politics.[15]

You might be interested in
What describes the supply and demand of oil production in Louisiana?
Fed [463]
The answer is b...........................
4 0
3 years ago
2)
Kipish [7]

<em>A.  Draw the nation into unnecessary conflicts.</em>

Explanation:

In 1920, the United States Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles, the peace treaty that ended World War I and created the League of Nations, due to fears that the League of Nations would draw the nation into unnecessary conflicts.

President Woodrow Wilson was the one who thought of the League of Nations, which was talked about in his Fourteen Points. His Fourteen Points were plans for during and after World War I and mostly had to do with peace and preventing future conflicts. The League of Nations ended up being part of the Treaty of Versailles, but even though United States President Woodrow Wilson came up with the League of Nations, the United States never ended up joining it.

This was because many people were isolationists after World War I. Isolationists did not want anything to do with foreign affairs, as they feared it would draw the nation into unnecessary conflicts. Many people did not want a repeat of World War I and essentially wanted to protect their country. The United States Senate was also filled with isolationists and wanted nothing to do with foreign problems, so they simply did not want to join the League of Nations.

6 0
3 years ago
Communist in the Soviets Union claimed that their form of government created a level playing field for citizens, whereas democra
Molodets [167]
A form of oppression ........................................................................................................................................
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How could having productive arguments and learning to fact-check support the common good and promote a healthy society?
IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

Productive argument help people see another perspective, while faxt-checking helps wade through misinformation and rumor.

6 0
3 years ago
What was one cause of the Sepoy Rebellion in India?
Vikentia [17]

The Indian Rebellion of 1857 had diverse political, economic, military, religious and social causes. ... The spark that led to a mutiny in several sepoy companies was the issue of new gunpowder cartridges for the Enfield rifle in February, 1857. A rumour was spread that the cartridges were made from cow and pig fat.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • URGENT!!!!!!!
    8·2 answers
  • What effect did the Crusades have on trade in Western Europe? A) They reduced trade from Scandinavia and Russia. B) They decreas
    12·2 answers
  • How did the Islamic challenge in Western Europe strengthen the role of the church
    10·1 answer
  • Why did many Northerners, including the Radical Republicans, believe the Southerners deserved
    14·1 answer
  • What does the names sohal mean
    10·1 answer
  • Is this statement true or false? Businesses grow where there is little transportation and few natural resources. A. True B. Fals
    7·2 answers
  • What were some of the proplems uder the Articles of Confederation
    12·2 answers
  • Which countries as part of the Axis powers in WWII battled against the United States and Allies? Choose three answers. O Germany
    14·1 answer
  • Put the events in order to show how a bill becomes a law.
    8·1 answer
  • Detail: Justinian restored the ? Roman Empire in the<br> and defeated the ?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!