1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
3 years ago
13

What is the iran-contra scandal

History
2 answers:
dsp733 years ago
6 0
The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration.
MrMuchimi3 years ago
3 0

The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.


The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]


The plan was later complicated in late 1985, when Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council diverted a portion of the proceeds from the Iranian weapon sales to fund the Contras, a group of anti-Sandinista rebel fighters, in their struggle against the socialist government of Nicaragua.[4] While President Ronald Reagan was a vocal supporter of the Contra cause,[7] the evidence is disputed as to whether he personally authorized the diversion of funds to the Contras.[4][5][8] Handwritten notes taken by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger on 7 December 1985 indicate that Reagan was aware of potential hostage transfers with Iran, as well as the sale of Hawk and TOW missiles to "moderate elements" within that country.[9] Weinberger wrote that Reagan said "he could answer to charges of illegality but couldn't answer to the charge that 'big strong President Reagan passed up a chance to free the hostages.'"[9] After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages.[10] The investigation was impeded when large volumes of documents relating to the affair were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.[11] On 4 March 1987, Reagan made a further nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for the affair and stating that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages".[12]


The affair was investigated by the U.S. Congress and by the three-person, Reagan-appointed Tower Commission. Neither investigation found evidence that President Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs.[4][5][8] In the end, fourteen administration officials were indicted, including then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Eleven convictions resulted, some of which were vacated on appeal.[13] The rest of those indicted or convicted were all pardoned in the final days of the presidency of George H. W. Bush, who had been Vice President at the time of the affair.[14] The Iran–Contra affair and the ensuing deception to protect senior administration officials (including President Reagan) has been cast as an example of post-truth politics.[15]

You might be interested in
Columbus's voyage was about the acquisition of?
Flauer [41]
<span>Columbus's voyage was about the acquisition of gold and spices. He started his long voyage with the aim to find India, where he would get those two things from, however, somehow he ended up in the New World, which he thought was India, but was in fact what came to be America. Thus, mistaking America for India, he named the inhabitants of the continent Indians. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
List two ways in which the Bhakti movement shaped Hinduism in India.
Arada [10]

Because of lord krishna, shankaraachaary

4 0
3 years ago
Almost half of the “new” immigrants who came to the United States in the late 1800s
9966 [12]

Answer

eventually returned to their home countries

Explanation

Many new immigrants entered in the US in the late 1800 in large numbers and most of them were from western and northern Europe. They fled to US because there was job shortage in their country and also crops farming failed due to their land being infertile and famine.There was also high taxation in their countries. Others were moving to US to seek for freedom due to the political and religion persecution. Many immigrants eventually returned to their home countries this is because in their mind they didn't come for a permanent stay.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think you can be a part of the LGBTQ+ and be Christian?
Lerok [7]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

everyone can have their own beliefs

8 0
2 years ago
Explain ONE way in which the author's point of view is significant for illustrating how European ideologies influenced the devel
My name is Ann [436]

Hello. You have not shown the text this question refers to. This makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.

A point of view is an opinion about something. When the author uses the point of view to illustrate European ideologies in 19th century Indian society, he presents how, in his opinion, these ideologies impacted and promoted various effects on Indian society. In this case, to answer this question, you need to read the text and identify the moment when the self takes a stand on this influence and this impact on Indian society...

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which running events did jesse owens compete in during the 1936 olympics?
    8·1 answer
  • In what ways did tobacco contribute to the development of the southern colonies?
    7·1 answer
  • Answer the question by filling in the last name of the correct person.
    13·1 answer
  • The principles of republicanism and Individual rights are embedded in which founding document ?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following situations could be found in a society before the Neolithic Revolution?
    13·2 answers
  • A difference between a political party and an interest group is that the main goal of -an interest group is to get its members e
    11·1 answer
  • In international trade comparative advantage is measured in A. Foreign exchange B. Efficiency C. Trade-weighted value D. Differe
    5·1 answer
  • Where does sea-floor spreading take place? a. convergent boundaries c. oceanic volcanoes b. transform boundaries d. mid-ocean ri
    15·2 answers
  • 3. The 15th Amendment said that all men could vote, regardless of race. Explain how
    13·1 answer
  • Some historians refer to the period between 1968 and 1969 in
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!