1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
2 years ago
13

What is the iran-contra scandal

History
2 answers:
dsp732 years ago
6 0
The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration.
MrMuchimi2 years ago
3 0

The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.


The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]


The plan was later complicated in late 1985, when Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council diverted a portion of the proceeds from the Iranian weapon sales to fund the Contras, a group of anti-Sandinista rebel fighters, in their struggle against the socialist government of Nicaragua.[4] While President Ronald Reagan was a vocal supporter of the Contra cause,[7] the evidence is disputed as to whether he personally authorized the diversion of funds to the Contras.[4][5][8] Handwritten notes taken by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger on 7 December 1985 indicate that Reagan was aware of potential hostage transfers with Iran, as well as the sale of Hawk and TOW missiles to "moderate elements" within that country.[9] Weinberger wrote that Reagan said "he could answer to charges of illegality but couldn't answer to the charge that 'big strong President Reagan passed up a chance to free the hostages.'"[9] After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages.[10] The investigation was impeded when large volumes of documents relating to the affair were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.[11] On 4 March 1987, Reagan made a further nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for the affair and stating that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages".[12]


The affair was investigated by the U.S. Congress and by the three-person, Reagan-appointed Tower Commission. Neither investigation found evidence that President Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs.[4][5][8] In the end, fourteen administration officials were indicted, including then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Eleven convictions resulted, some of which were vacated on appeal.[13] The rest of those indicted or convicted were all pardoned in the final days of the presidency of George H. W. Bush, who had been Vice President at the time of the affair.[14] The Iran–Contra affair and the ensuing deception to protect senior administration officials (including President Reagan) has been cast as an example of post-truth politics.[15]

You might be interested in
Give three reasons why some Americans supported the annexation (take over) of the Philippines by the United States.
Artemon [7]

Answer:

Americans who advocated annexation evinced a variety of motivations: desire for commercial opportunities in Asia, concern that the Filipinos were incapable of self-rule, and fear that if the United States did not take control of the islands, another power (such as Germany or Japan) might do so.

4 0
2 years ago
Please Help!!!!!
Masja [62]
D. John 

King from 1199 to 1216
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following occurred asa result of Constantine the great founding of new Rome
Tresset [83]

The empire separated between its western and eastern segments. The Eastern Empire kept going longer politically.

Constantine tried to bind together the realm under the Christian confidence understanding and requiring the Nicea Council to meet close to Constantinople in 325 AD. Additionally, Constantine's move of the cash-flow to New Rome left the Bishop of Rome as the most grounded authority figure in Rome itself, which empowered the improvement of the intensity of the papacy.

4 0
3 years ago
Which step in the budget process do both houses of Congress control?
Anvisha [2.4K]

<u>Answer:</u>

Both houses work on spending bills based on the president's budget.

<u>Explanation:</u>

  • The House of Representatives and the Senate are both authorized to discuss over the spending bills once the President presents the budget for the given financial year.
  • These bills include the provisions done for the expenditure to be done on the functioning of the government and on the implementation of various schemes introduced newly.
  • The houses reach on a common ground before the bills are worked on and passed.
3 0
3 years ago
What is a proxy war?
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

a war instigated by a major power which does not itself become involved.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Elton mayo's hawthorne experiments were the focal point of the human relations movement, which emphasized the importance of the
    14·1 answer
  • Question 1(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
    6·2 answers
  • 1. The ____ was crucial to Britain's Industrial Revolution. (1 point) bicycle flying shuttle water-powered loom steam engine
    11·1 answer
  • There are no answer choices, I just need an answer that is true!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Look at the equation framework. Which of the following lists the proper placement of terms, from left to right, to complete the
    8·2 answers
  • Which event were the colonist being punished for
    8·1 answer
  • Why is population size important for a war effort?
    12·1 answer
  • Please help due in 10 min
    8·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of a slave revolt, slave insurrection, or slave rebellion? Question 1 options: The typical aim was to gain
    5·2 answers
  • 7th and 8th grade history
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!