Answer: As adults, these children might struggle to improve their standard of living.
Explanation:
Child labor is considered work carried out by minors before having the legal age to work. That is, <em>before the age of 18.
</em>
<em>
</em>
At the beginning of the industrial era, there were no rights for workers, who had extreme working conditions. In the absence of any regulation, it was common for factories to hire children to do the jobs with a lower payment than they paid an adult. Also, children were exposed to accidents, illnesses, or mutilations.
<em>Because of this, when children grew up, it was unlikely that their living conditions improved; usually these children died at a young age in extreme poverty</em>.
This situation did not help to have a healthy economy for the country since the quality of life of the inhabitants was not high.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:One of the most hotly debated clauses in the Constitution deals with the removal of federal government officials through the impeachment process. But what did the Founders who crafted that language think about the process and its overall intention?
George MasonThe need for the ultimate check, and in particular the removal of the President, in a system of checks and balances was brought up early at the 1787 convention in Philadelphia. Constitutional heavyweights such as James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, James Wilson and Gouverneur Morris debated the Impeachment Clause at the convention, and Alexander Hamilton argued for it in The Federalist after the convention.
Today, impeachment remains as a rarely used process to potentially remove the “President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States” if Congress finds them guilty of “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
Explanation:
Answer:
- Freedom from the influence of the Great Britain
They no longer had to put up with the pressure of having to elect officials that is wanted by the Great Britain. They can elect someone who can genuinely care for the country's development.
- Ability to forms their own laws that are suitable to their own culture
some of the laws that made during the colonization designed to conformed to western principles / philosophy. Making own their constitution means that India no longer have to do this.
- Ability to form an alliance outside of Great Britain's social circle.
Such as Russia and China for example. They won't be able to form an alliance with them if they are still under the British influence.
- Create the economy that benefit Indian people
Under British's rule, the trades laws that passed will most likely benefit the Great Britain rather than the Indian people. They will decide which products gets the subsidy and how much the products they can export. But this commodities might not be popular In Indian market.
Answer: (B) Conflict perspective
Explanation:
The conflict perspective is the process of analyzing the various types of sociological framework conflicts and it basically focuses on the distribution of the various types of resources and power.
The conflict perspective basically explain about the social change and the conflicts due to the different people have their won different perspective.
According to the given question, the above given analysis basically reflecting the conflict perspective due to the critics of the television conflicts.
Therefore, Option (B) is correct answer.
The answer is Alaska and Hawaii. I hope this helped.
