1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
igor_vitrenko [27]
4 years ago
8

Families in a Western nation would accept a policy like China’s one-child policy? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
Allushta [10]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

If its from my angle I won't take it fron their angle they will take it

Explanation:

Reason:

1. The population in China is one of the laargest in this world.

2. Theyvmay not have enough money to cater for two kids

You might be interested in
Which advantages did the British have over the colonists during the American war for Independence?​
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

they had a more powerful country because they ruled over a lot of places, but that was also a drawback because they had more enemies who wanted independence from british tyranny

8 0
3 years ago
How did the War of 1812 impact Omaha?
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

In the War of 1812, the United States took on the greatest naval power in the world, Great Britain, in a conflict that would have an immense impact on the young country’s future. Causes of the war included British attempts to restrict U.S. trade, the Royal Navy’s impressment of American seamen and America’s desire to expand its territory.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why was the Free Soil Party, and Liberty Party important and major?
goldenfox [79]

Hey!

Answer:

Free-Soil Party, (1848–54), minor but influential political party in the pre-Civil War period of American history that opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories. Fearful of expanding slave power within the national government, Rep. David Wilmot of Pennsylvania in 1846 introduced into Congress his famous Wilmot Proviso, calling for the prohibition of slavery in the vast southwestern lands that had been newly acquired from Mexico. The Wilmot concept, which failed in Congress, was a direct ideological antecedent to the Free-Soil Party. Disappointed by the ambivalent position of the Whig Party toward slavery, “Conscience” Whigs held a convention in August 1848 at Buffalo, New York. There they were joined by delegates from 17 states drawn from the Liberty Party and the antislavery faction of the New York Democrats, known as “Barnburners.” The Free-Soilers’ historic slogan calling for “free soil, free speech, free labour, and free men” attracted small farmers, debtors, village merchants, and household and mill workers, who resented the prospect of black-labour competition—whether slave or free—in the territories.

In early 1840, abolitionists founded the Liberty Party as a political outlet for their antislavery beliefs. A mere eight years later, bolstered by the increasing slavery debate and growing sectional conflict, the party had grown to challenge the two mainstream political factions in many areas. In The Liberty Party, 1840–1848, Reinhard O. Johnson provides the first comprehensive history of this short-lived but important third party, detailing how it helped to bring the antislavery movement to the forefront of American politics and became the central institutional vehicle in the fight against slavery.

As the major instrument of antislavery sentiment, the Liberty organization was more than a political party and included not only eligible voters but also disfranchised African Americans and women. Most party members held evangelical beliefs, and as Johnson relates, an intense religiosity permeated most of the group’s activities. He discusses the party’s founding and its national growth through the presidential election of 1844; its struggles to define itself amid serious internal disagreements over philosophy, strategy, and tactics in the ensuing years; and the reasons behind its decline and merger into the Free Soil coalition in 1848.

<em>You can refer to these 3 paragraphs, </em>

<em>Hope it helps :)</em>

<em>Though I may be wrong :(</em>

<em>Have a great day!</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Followers of al-Qaida justify their terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001 by _____. declaring that the Sa
kvv77 [185]

I'm pretty sure it's C: "pointing to the U.S. military presence on Islamic soil" =)

6 0
3 years ago
Why did British troops march to Concord?
son4ous [18]
Having already learned of the orders, colonial leaders fled Boston to avoid arrest. Gage decided to seize and destroy arms the patriots had stored at Concord<span>, 20 miles northwest of Boston. On the night of April 18, 1775, 700 </span>British soldiers<span>began to </span>march<span> toward </span>Concord<span>.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • I need the answers fast plz I really don’t wanna fail ‼️
    9·1 answer
  • Three of the following improvements in agriculture that helped to bring on the Agricultural Revolution are correctly paired with
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement describes the Supreme Court's decision in the Brown v. Board of Education case? A. It agreed with the earlier Pl
    7·1 answer
  • What is Stanton’s purpose in borrowing so heavily from Jefferson’s Declaration?
    13·1 answer
  • The Atlantic slave trade was part of a
    8·1 answer
  • All of the following were advances in technology during and just after World War ||
    9·1 answer
  • Question #7
    9·2 answers
  • In which order were these documents written and adopted?
    7·1 answer
  • I need help with this PLEASE
    14·1 answer
  • What is one reason that the United States invaded Iraq after the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!