1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alex41 [277]
2 years ago
6

Which statement best explains why, during the 1800s, manufacturers resisted workers’ demands for higher wages and safer workplac

es?
Manufacturers had already spent money on training their workers.
Manufacturers were afraid workers would make additional demands.
Manufacturers knew their workforce would have to become smaller.
Manufacturers knew their companies would become less profitable.
History
2 answers:
iren [92.7K]2 years ago
4 0
D) Manufactures knew their companies would become less profitable
Bingel [31]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

D) Manufacturers knew their companies would become less profitable.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What was the natchez uprising ?
Mnenie [13.5K]
It was in 1941 and 1943
8 0
3 years ago
Why does Douglass call this celebration a “hypocrisy” in 1852?
PIT_PIT [208]

Answer:

"I will not equivocate - I will not excuse." I will use the severest language I can command, and yet not one word shall escape me that any man, whose judgment is not blinded by prejudice, or who is not at heart a slave-holder, shall not confess to be right and just.

Explanation:

he did it to explain the hypocrisy hope it helps if so mark brainliest if it doesn't help then i am sorry

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Mussolini plan to “restore the power and glory of the Roman Empire
Gennadij [26K]

Mussolini planned tor restore the glory of the Roman Empire by taking over the neighboring lands.

Explanation:

Mussolini used a rather strong argument for his own fascist and imperialistic tendencies by evoking Rome and its glorious empire of the past.

The insistence was that if the law of Mussolini was followed the people could realistically go back to the days of the roman empire, something that was quite improbable in the modern world.

He was willing to do this by expanding military might and by subjugating the other nations around Italy.

4 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt:
Marat540 [252]

Based on this excerpt, we can infer that the point that Ida B. Wells is trying to make is that<u> D. </u><u>White men </u><u>rarely </u><u>embrace progressive </u><u>ideas without a </u><u>financial motive.</u>

Ida Bell Wells was:

  • A journalist who reported on the racist actions of white people in the United States, especially in the South
  • A Civil rights leader
  • A key individual in the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).

In this excerpt, Ida Bells is saying that in order to get a White man to listen to anything, one would need to convince them that there is a financial gain to be made.

In reference to the Progressive Era therefore, we can infer that Wells was of the opinion that White men would only support progressive ideals if they stood to make something from it.

In conclusion, Ida Wells was saying that white men rarely embrace progressive ideals unless they stand to gain financially.

<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/23500689. </em>

5 0
2 years ago
England started the Navigation Acts in the mid-1600s to
Hunter-Best [27]

                In the 1600s, for Britain to restrict colonial trade, the Navigation Acts were made.  The Parliament made the Acts to protect the British shipping against the Dutch and other foreign powers. The competition in trading was very evident during that time thus this was one of their purposes. Another is for Britain to have monopoly on colonial commodities like tobacco and sugar. During that time, the principle of mercantilism dominated when it comes to the economic system. The context stated that the nation’s wealth depends on accumulated supply of gold. As per conventional wisdom, wealth is limited because there is also a limited supply of gold. And imperialism states that primarily colonies, preferably through the discovery of gold but also through the production of natural resources, expanded its wealth. Mercantilist model states that open trade could only result to loss of wealth and this was what the Navigation Acts wanted to lessen if not abolish. The Acts were made for the purpose of retaining the imperial realm’s wealth where trading power had to utilize the colonies’ resources within a closed- trade system. 

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • For which purpose do authors use character traits?
    11·1 answer
  • What were 2 ways that the industrial revolution caused Europeans to look for new colonies
    8·1 answer
  • The mayflower compact was named after
    15·1 answer
  • What role did Toussaint Louverture play in the Haitian Revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the US acquire texas?
    5·1 answer
  • Help with this question what is it
    11·2 answers
  • Vagrancy laws in the 1860s applied to
    11·1 answer
  • Please help
    8·1 answer
  • How did the American Revolution contribute to the start of the French<br> Revolution?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the layout of Mesopotamian cities?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!