Answer to Question 1: Hamlet becomes increasingly furious with both himself and whoever harmed those who he cared about. A visceral sentiment of vengeance consumes him as he realizes his mind won't be at peace if he simply stands around fearfully inside his aristocratic eggshell, and the sentiment won't snuff out until the ones responsible for his anger are punished.
Answer to Question 2: Hamlet believes he will become a beast if he gives himself into an avenging wrath, but it does not matter to him as long as his grieving thoughts are cleansed. Ignoring the incident would simply preserve his plight.
Answer to Question 3: The audience should feel compasion for the man in duel, and be afraid that a good man who's well aware of his own thoughts and conclusions - a man that has lost nearly everything - gave into the rage.
Director's notes on Proper Soliloquies.
An actor who aims to perform a soliloquy must look around their environment, focus on a significant element of the scene, and procced to describe with detail how the sight makes them feel - repeat the process with the rest of the scene -. The actor should change the tone of their voice between the lines depending on the current feeling of their character; shouting it all should not be neccesary and might be considered exaggerated.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
a is the correct answer because it best describes the meaning to settle, b describes it as finding something and c is also as finding something.
Answer:
the increasing risk of automation and artificial intelligence in the employment sector.
Explanation:
The article "Heads Up, Humans: Get Ready" by Claudia Alarcon essentially talks about the increasing risk of automation and artificial intelligence in the employment sector. The author highlights how these technological advances in last few decades have already put about 40 percent of jobs at risk. This can be evidently reported from the research "According to a new report by a multi-national accounting and consulting firm based in London, 38% of U.S. jobs are at high risk of being replaced by robots and artificial intelligence".
The author further elaborates about how AI experts like Jerry Kaplan and physicist Steven Hawkings projected the same fate of losing jobs to automation and artificial intelligence in the near future.
Answer:
Jacob Fielding is your average teenager. But one day he is given an amazing power that grants him absolute invincibility, but at a cost. The longer you have said ability, the more suicidal psychopathic you become. The only way to get rid of this curse is to simply say the words, "You are invincible" to the person of your choice.
Jacob soon starts to realize he has this power. Without realizing, he signs his friend Ophelia’s cast with the words “You are indestructible” Then things start to go awry. The children become obsessed with his power and only want to use it for themselves.
Ophelia soon becomes dark and sinister like the other children. Jacob and his other friend Milo spend the rest of the book attempting to save her. One common theme in this book is that “with power comes great responsibility” The dark and twistedness of this book illustrates this theme through all of its characters.
A trick for translating is only use words you know
If you want an accurate translator I suggest Spanish dict
I have to go or I would do it sorry
Best of luck my friend
Explanation:
Answer:
The first uses dialogue and character; the second uses first-person point of view.
Explanation:
The first excerpt is found in Chapter Eight titled "September 2nd, 1973" from <em>Fever 1793</em> by Laurie Halse Anderson is based on the yellow fever epidemic that ravaged Philadelphia. The story is from the point of view of the young Mattie Cook, describing how the pandemic had destroyed the lives of the people.
The second excerpt is from <em>The Summer of the Pestilence</em> by George Dodd Armstrong. The book also deals with the history of the same yellow fever that not only affected Philadelphia but also other parts of the nation such as Virginia.
While both books deal with the same pandemic, their dealing with the issue of unprecedented deaths differ a bit. The first book uses a dialogue-conversation approach, with the characters greatly involved whereas the second book uses the first person point of view to address the deaths. These two books may deal with the same issue but their approaches of the deaths and sick people differ such that their narrative plots also differ.
