1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreev551 [17]
2 years ago
14

What is the most significant limitation that Carl Schurz’s work has, as a resource for a historian? He was not an eyewitness to

the events he describes. He was too young to be a reliable witness. He was an employee of the government and likely biased against the revolutionaries. He wrote his account about fifty years after the events occurred.
History
1 answer:
nirvana33 [79]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

He wrote his account about fifty years after the events occurred.

Explanation:

Carl Christian Schurz was a statesman, writer, and reformer of the United States. Following the German revolution of 1848, he moved to the United States and was made a leading member of the emerging Republican Party. He published several writings, including a two-volume biography of Henry Clay (1887), a volume of speeches (1865), and his Reminiscences (1907–09). As per the question, his works limitation lies in the gap of the timeframe when the actual event occurred and when he finally wrote it down.

You might be interested in
In 1587, the Roanoke colony was built on an island off the coast of North Carolina. on the Chesapeake Bay coast. on the Atlantic
Hatshy [7]

Answer:

In 1587, a group of 115 settlers from England arrived at Roanoke Island, which is off the coast of North Carolina. The governor of the colony, John White, decided to return to England that year to replenish supplies. However, a major war broke out in Europe, and White's return to Roanoke was delayed by three whole years.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why do you think congress amended to the constitution to require that no president serve longer than 2 terms? do you agree with
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

I think congress amended to the constitution to require that no president serve more than 2 terms as to be sure no president turned into a king or tyrannical leader. I agree with this amendment as it helps keep order and wont allow any president to overstay their welcome and gain to much power. The founding fathers were just escaping a king and they would not want a president to be like a king.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
List four groups of people, other than the jews, who were targeted during the holocaust
avanturin [10]
1 jipsys
2 blacks
3 gays
4 homosexuals
hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
For two centuries American protection of religious and personal freedom along with opportunities for social and economic mobilit
Harrizon [31]

Answer:

I’m pretty sure you need your own family for this question, perhaps asking your parents about this?

Explanation:

but hey correct me if you think i am wrong

7 0
2 years ago
1. Which of the following is a function of the executive branch? (1 point)
Xelga [282]

Answer:

administering the law

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was a transportation need in the growing cities?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the goal of the United States in issuing the Open Door Policy?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the spread and development of religion help or hurt the roman empire
    6·1 answer
  • If you where born in 1961 how old were you in 1973
    10·2 answers
  • What was the main purpose of the Sugar Act of 1764?
    12·1 answer
  • The term “civil” refers to the private rights of citizens.<br><br> True or false
    6·2 answers
  • What was the result of the protests in Tiananmen Square in 1989?
    10·2 answers
  • What is a Private property
    11·1 answer
  • Is this statement true or false?
    15·2 answers
  • Lt. Col. Doolittle's bombing of Tokyo
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!