1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Talja [164]
3 years ago
15

How did trust by companies like standard oil benefit and damage the u.s economy during the late 19th century?

History
2 answers:
Alekssandra [29.7K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Since its inception until the dissolution of the company Standard Oil succeeded in controlling the routes of transportation, primarily the railroads and pipeline. ... One thing that these deals did that benefited the economy was that increased efficiency in the railroads as well as the refineries.

Explanation:

miskamm [114]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Since its inception until the dissolution of the company Standard Oil succeeded in controlling the routes of transportation, primarily the railroads and pipeline. ... One thing that these deals did that benefited the economy was that increased efficiency in the railroads as well as the refineries.On May 15, 1911, the Supreme Court ordered the dissolution of Standard Oil Company, ruling it was in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. ... Rockefeller entered the oil industry in the 1860s and in 1870, and founded Standard Oil with some other business partners.The popular explanation of this case is that Standard Oil monopolized the oil industry, destroyed rivals through the use of predatory price-cutting, raised prices to consumers and was punished by the Supreme Court for these proven transgressions.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Required
dexar [7]

Answer:

France and austria

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the effect of the invention of the cotton gin on the United States in the first half of the nineteenth century?
mamaluj [8]
The South became more dependent on slavery, deepening the differences between the South and the North
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the United States invade Afghanistan in 2001? A) To respond to Terrorist attack on U.S territory B) To Protect neighbori
bazaltina [42]
The US innovation of Afghanistan was a response to the 9/11/01 attacks on the US. So A. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
in view of soviet policies toward eastern europe in the postwar era, what reasons did people in eastern europe have for resistan
Bogdan [553]
Because the soviets were with the nazis at that time and europe was going to be taken over during world war II
4 0
4 years ago
Why does every government decision cost something?
BabaBlast [244]
Think about the idea here and you'll see how the idea of "cost" is inevitable in every decision.  (It's true not just of governments, but of our own decisions too -- but we'll focus on governments here.)

Let's say the government decides it wants all citizens to have access to health care.  Well, that's going to cost dollars to pay for that health care.  Where will those dollars come from?

Let's say the government decides, in response to school shootings or other acts of gun violence, to ban certain types of guns or ammunition.  That costs something to the gun dealers who were making money off those sales (and they'll object).  Or let's say the government decides to do further and deeper background checks on all gun buyers.  Well, that will cost something in terms of personnel and processes to accomplish all the background checks.  Or let's say the government decides to increase mental health screenings and treatment because persons with mental illness issues may become violent and dangerous to society.  That will cost much in order to organize and carry out better mental health intervention across the country.

I focused on just a couple issues there (health care, gun control).  But the same principle holds on anything government does.  You can think about your own examples that you'd want to use.  Anything the government decides to do comes with some sort of costs attached.  That doesn't mean it's bad to make such decisions -- it just means we need to count the cost and invest our efforts where they will have the best benefit.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where did Europen nations badly needed sources from during WW1
    5·2 answers
  • Today, ______ is thriving in latin america.
    8·2 answers
  • How did civil war in england shape the development of british north america?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following processes most directly helps create soil from rocks?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the chief provisions in the USA Patriot Act?
    12·1 answer
  • Why does Douglass want to continue teaching
    5·2 answers
  • What was the most important difference between Muhammad’s teachings and the beliefs of other Arabs?
    9·2 answers
  • Why did southern cities grow more slowly than Northern cities
    9·2 answers
  • Why was France willing to sell the French Territory to the United States?
    12·2 answers
  • 6. Why do the Pueblo peoples most likely view Chaco Canyon, a traditional Anasazi site, as a
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!