1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vitfil [10]
3 years ago
13

Consider the strategies (such as marches, legal challenges, boycotts, civil disobedience, and sit-ins) used by activists in the

civil rights movement.
For two of these strategies, discuss:

examples of how the strategy was used.
how effective the strategy was, and why.
History
2 answers:
Sonja [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The modern civil rights movement grew out of a long history of social protest. In the South, any protest risked violent retaliation. Even so, between 1900 and 1950, community leaders in many Southern cities protested segregation.

Explanation:

dedylja [7]3 years ago
3 0

Funny story actually. Many of these were copied from Gandhi's Civil disobedience sense of logic. To punish people that are doing nothing wrong but just protesting is just ethically and morally wrong. Like shooting at someone clearly not a threat, and is not armed.

You might be interested in
Select the economic activities that would be found or that most likely would succeed in Virginia.
Contact [7]
A is it I think idk lol
8 0
2 years ago
Why were the first people in America called "Paleolithic"? O A) They made stone tools. B) They ate dried meat. C) They used the
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

Why were the first people in America called "Paleolithic"?

A) They made stone tools.

4 0
3 years ago
What has been the greatest injustice in regards to the Native Americans?
Alina [70]

Answer

Taking land, mass murder, or just plain kicking them out.

Explanation:

you take your pick

8 0
3 years ago
“If a nation is attacked the only recourse is to attack back” Agree or disagree and why?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
Not really,

It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.
 some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.
in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.
in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.
 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the 1950s, tensions between china and what country grew significantly
stellarik [79]
I believe the answer is the United States. 
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3) Where was the first Dutch colony in New Netherlands? What city is that region a part of today?
    10·1 answer
  • How was Scotland able to maintain a religion separate from England?
    8·1 answer
  • How does their sovereign status as nations affect how native american tribes make treaties?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a reason why historians study societal change?
    13·2 answers
  • Historians rely on primary sources because these sources
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement about an important event that led to german unification is true?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following climates is most suited for physical weathering?
    10·1 answer
  • How did Traute Grier describe her experience? What was her point of view? Describe your answer in at least two sentences.
    10·2 answers
  • Was thomas fessenden a British or colonists
    10·2 answers
  • What were the Bantustans? How did the Bantustans help the white minority gain, maintain, and consolidate power in apartheid Sout
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!