Answer:
a. The actual unemployment rate was higher during the recession of 1990-1991, but cyclical unemployment was higher in 2001.
Explanation:
Unemployment is defined as the number of people in a population that are willing to work and seeking for jobs but do not have employment.
Natural unemployment is defined as the normal process of leaving jobs and getting jobs in a situation when there is full employment.
Cyclical unemployment is created by recessions and booms.
Actual unemployment = Natural rate + Cyclical rate
Cyclical unemployment= Actual rate - Natural rate
In the first economy
Cyclical rate = 7 - 5.9= 1.1%
In the second economy
Cyclical rate= 6 - 4.8= 1.2%
So actual unemployment was 7% in 1990-1991 while in 2001 it was 6%
Cyclical unemployment was 1.1% in 1990-1991, while cyclical unemployment was 1.2%
Answer:
The correct answer is the option E: Unrealistic performance goals.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the particular situation that the executive board of a company knows about the market size decrease for its products and still want to encourage their salespeople to encounter a higher target regarding the previous one, then the company is ahead of unrealistic performance goals and should understand the fact that if the employees do not achieve their goals as planned then they might try to play unfair and start to behave unethical because they will not want to lose their job. Therefore that Bryan acted in a an unethical way in order to meet the target established by the company in a particulary drastic situation.
Answer:
(c) $5
Explanation:
Remember, To calculate marginal cost, we divide the change in production costs by the change in quantity.
In this example, the change in production cost is $200 (for hiring an additional worker) while the change in quantity of taco is 40 (increase in marginal productivity).
The marginal cost= $200/40
we get $5 as the marginal cost.
I believe the answer is (D): a study routine. I had the same problem in the past, and I didn't want to quit anything, so I found a study routine to be able to squeeze in my studying.
Answer:
EOQ 400 units
inventory cost $1,200
holding $600
ordering $600
reorder point 369.9 pounds
Explanation:
EOQ
<u>Where:</u>
D = annual demand = 200 days x 75 pound per day = 15,000
S= setup cost = ordering cost = $ 16
H= Holding Cost = $ 3
EOQ 400
Inventory cost:
average inventory x holding cost
400/2 x $3 = $600 holding cost
order per year x order cost
15,000/400 x $16 = $600 order cost
<u>reorder point: demand x lead time + safety stock</u>
to get a confidence of 99% we need to look at the table for a Z value which is above 99% of the cases and then, move it to our ditribution.
In the talbe we got at a Z of 2.33 has a score of 0.99 which is the probability we want.
Now we calculate the safety stock
safety stock: 69.9
This is the safety stock
Now the company will reorder at:
daily use x lead time + safety stock:
75 x 4 + 69.9 =
300 + 69.9 = 369.9
